Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2009

01.11.2009 | Clinical Investigation

Results of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Proximal Neck Using Large Stent-Grafts

verfasst von: Hany A. Zayed, Rachel E. Bell, Rachel E. Clough, Stephen Thomas, Tarun Sabharwal, John F. Reidy, Tom W. Carrell, Peter R. Taylor

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early outcome of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) with an unfavorable neck anatomy using extralarge stent-grafts. We carried out a retrospective review of all patients who underwent elective EVAR using large diameter stent-grafts between June 2006 and February 2008. All patients had computed tomography angiography (CTA) for procedure planning, and detailed assessment of the aneurysm neck was performed using a three-dimensional CTA workstation. All patients were followed up with CTA at 3 and 12 months and annual duplex thereafter when appropriate. This analysis included 25 patients (23 men, 2 woman; median age, 76 years; age range, 60–88 years). The median aneurysm diameter was 7 cm, and the median aneurysm neck diameter was 31 mm. Extralarge Cook-Zenith stent-grafts were used in all patients, with a top-end diameter of 36 mm (n = 23) and 40 mm (n = 2). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 24 months, with a median of 6 months. Primary and assisted primary technical success rates were 80% and 96%, respectively. Reintervention was required to treat proximal type I endoleak (n = 1), iliac limb kink (n = 2), and occluded femorofemoral crossover graft (n = 1). These early results show that EVAR using extralarge stent-grafts with suprarenal fixation can be a reliable modality to treat infrarenal aortic aneurysms with an unfavorable neck anatomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat EVAR Trial Participants (2005) Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:2179–2186CrossRef EVAR Trial Participants (2005) Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:2179–2186CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ouriel K, Tanquilut E, Greenberg RK et al (2003) Aortoiliac morphologic correlations in aneurysms undergoing endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 38:323–328CrossRefPubMed Ouriel K, Tanquilut E, Greenberg RK et al (2003) Aortoiliac morphologic correlations in aneurysms undergoing endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 38:323–328CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Arko FR, Filis KA, Seidel SA et al (2004) How many patients with infrarenal aneurysms are candidates for endovascular repair? The North California experience. J Endovasc Ther 11:33–40CrossRefPubMed Arko FR, Filis KA, Seidel SA et al (2004) How many patients with infrarenal aneurysms are candidates for endovascular repair? The North California experience. J Endovasc Ther 11:33–40CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohen IV, Laheij RJ, Harris PL (2001) Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:344–349CrossRef Mohen IV, Laheij RJ, Harris PL (2001) Risk factors for endoleak and the evidence for stent-graft oversizing in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:344–349CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bush RL, Najibi S, Lin PH et al (2002) Conservation and new technology: the impact on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Surg 68:57–60PubMed Bush RL, Najibi S, Lin PH et al (2002) Conservation and new technology: the impact on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Surg 68:57–60PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaikof E, Fillinger M, Matsumura J et al (2002) Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:1061–1066CrossRefPubMed Chaikof E, Fillinger M, Matsumura J et al (2002) Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 35:1061–1066CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Waasdorp EJ, de Vries JP, Hobo R et al (2005) Aneurysm diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence clinical outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair. A 4-year EUROSTAR experience. Ann Vasc Surg 19:755–761CrossRefPubMed Waasdorp EJ, de Vries JP, Hobo R et al (2005) Aneurysm diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence clinical outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair. A 4-year EUROSTAR experience. Ann Vasc Surg 19:755–761CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore WS, Kashyap VS, Vescera CL et al (1999) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg 230:298–308CrossRefPubMed Moore WS, Kashyap VS, Vescera CL et al (1999) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg 230:298–308CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Rhee RY et al (2003) Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg 38:657–663CrossRefPubMed Dillavou ED, Muluk SC, Rhee RY et al (2003) Does hostile neck anatomy preclude successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg 38:657–663CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marin ML, Parsons RE, Hollier LH et al (1998) Impact of transrenal aortic endograft placement on endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 28:638–646CrossRefPubMed Marin ML, Parsons RE, Hollier LH et al (1998) Impact of transrenal aortic endograft placement on endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 28:638–646CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins M, Kritpracha B, Beebe HG et al (2005) Suprarenal endograft fixation avoids adverse outcomes associated with aortic neck angulation. Ann Vasc Surg 19:172–177CrossRefPubMed Robbins M, Kritpracha B, Beebe HG et al (2005) Suprarenal endograft fixation avoids adverse outcomes associated with aortic neck angulation. Ann Vasc Surg 19:172–177CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias NV, Resch T, Malina M et al (2001) Intraoperative proximal endoleaks during AAA stent-graft repair: evaluation of risk factors and treatment with Palmaz stent. J Endovasc Ther 8:268–273CrossRefPubMed Dias NV, Resch T, Malina M et al (2001) Intraoperative proximal endoleaks during AAA stent-graft repair: evaluation of risk factors and treatment with Palmaz stent. J Endovasc Ther 8:268–273CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moise MA, Woo EY, Velasquez OC et al (2006) Barriers to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: past experience and implications for future device development. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:197–203CrossRef Moise MA, Woo EY, Velasquez OC et al (2006) Barriers to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: past experience and implications for future device development. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:197–203CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Choke E, Munneke G, Morgan R et al (2006) Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:975–980CrossRef Choke E, Munneke G, Morgan R et al (2006) Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 29:975–980CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanley BM, Semmens JM, Mai Q et al (2001) Patient selection guidelines for endoluminal AAA repair with the Zenith stent-graft: the Australian experience. J Endovasc Ther 8:457–464CrossRefPubMed Stanley BM, Semmens JM, Mai Q et al (2001) Patient selection guidelines for endoluminal AAA repair with the Zenith stent-graft: the Australian experience. J Endovasc Ther 8:457–464CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DE, Jacobs DL, Montaganahalli Rl et al (2006) Outcomes of endovascular AAA repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy using adjunctive balloon-expandable stents. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:35–40CrossRef Cox DE, Jacobs DL, Montaganahalli Rl et al (2006) Outcomes of endovascular AAA repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy using adjunctive balloon-expandable stents. Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:35–40CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingle I, Fishwick G, Thompson MM et al (2002) Endovascular repair of wide neck AAA—preliminary report on feasibility and complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24:123–127CrossRefPubMed Ingle I, Fishwick G, Thompson MM et al (2002) Endovascular repair of wide neck AAA—preliminary report on feasibility and complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24:123–127CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Results of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with an Unfavorable Proximal Neck Using Large Stent-Grafts
verfasst von
Hany A. Zayed
Rachel E. Bell
Rachel E. Clough
Stephen Thomas
Tarun Sabharwal
John F. Reidy
Tom W. Carrell
Peter R. Taylor
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9557-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Announcements

Announcements

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.