Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 4/2014

01.12.2014 | Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (A Fader, Section Editor)

Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Updates and Innovations

verfasst von: Pedro F. Escobar, Pilar E. Silva, Joshua A. Makhoul, Martin A. Martino

Erschienen in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Surgical advances in minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotics, have revolutionized the practice of medicine and surgery in gynecologic oncology. During this time, an emphasis has been made to improve quality metrics such as complications, readmissions, and length of stay. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement has recommended health systems and surgeons to improve performance focused on better care, better quality, and better cost. Minimally invasive surgery may help to achieve these measures and serve as the foundation upon which these goals are reached. Despite the availability of laparoscopic tools at many hospitals, the majority of patients who had gynecologic cancer surgery in the United States had a laparotomy prior to the introduction of robot-assisted surgery. Reasons for this have been attributed to limitations of laparoscopy, which include 2D vision and rigid instruments without articulation. One of the greatest advancements in gynecologic surgery occurred in 2005, when the FDA approved the da Vinci surgical platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for use in gynecologic surgery. This platform provides a 3D vision system paired with wristed articulating instruments. Together, these enhancements may overcome some of the limitations of laparoscopy allowing for surgeons to perform less open surgery. The introduction of robotics in 2005 has led to an increase in minimally invasive surgery and significantly less open surgery – especially for the gynecologic oncology patient. This review will focus on recent advancements in robotic surgery in the field of gynecology oncology. It will also discuss the role for standardizing education and training through the development of training and educational networks to improve surgical outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5331–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5331–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1422–31.PubMedCrossRef Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1422–31.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS. 2009;13(3):364–9.PubMedCentralPubMed Shashoua AR, Gill D, Locher SR. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. JSLS. 2009;13(3):364–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicole N, Rachel C, Michael M, et al. Robotic Assisted, Total Laparoscopic, and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Management of Uterine Cancer. J Cancer Ther. 2012;3(2):162–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nicole N, Rachel C, Michael M, et al. Robotic Assisted, Total Laparoscopic, and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Management of Uterine Cancer. J Cancer Ther. 2012;3(2):162–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abunnaja S, Cuviello A, Albini MS, Mirmehdi I, Shah J, Sanchez JA. Robotic surgery in gynecology: program initiation and early outcomes at a community hospital. Conn Med. 2013;77(4):223–5.PubMed Abunnaja S, Cuviello A, Albini MS, Mirmehdi I, Shah J, Sanchez JA. Robotic surgery in gynecology: program initiation and early outcomes at a community hospital. Conn Med. 2013;77(4):223–5.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leitao MM, Bartashnik A, Wagner I, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1031–7.PubMedCrossRef Leitao MM, Bartashnik A, Wagner I, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotically assisted laparoscopy for newly diagnosed uterine cancers. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1031–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):41–5.PubMedCrossRef Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, Abaid LN, Mendivil A, Boggess JF. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):41–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):180–4.PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):180–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Greer M, Gregurich MA, Wolf J, Bodurka DC, et al. Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:746–53.PubMedCrossRef Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT, Greer M, Gregurich MA, Wolf J, Bodurka DC, et al. Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:746–53.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberg L1, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:852061. doi: 10.1155/2011/852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28. Weinberg L1, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:852061. doi: 10.​1155/​2011/​852061. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Frumovitz M, Dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):96–102.PubMedCrossRef Frumovitz M, Dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):96–102.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(2):252–5.PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, Coleman RL, Levenback C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(2):252–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchal, Rauch P, Vandromme J, et al. Telerobotic- assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc and Other Interv Tech. 2005;19(6):826–31.CrossRef Marchal, Rauch P, Vandromme J, et al. Telerobotic- assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc and Other Interv Tech. 2005;19(6):826–31.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):357 e1–7. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):357 e1–7.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(1):86–91.PubMedCrossRef Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(1):86–91.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nick AM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, et al. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:276–80.PubMedCrossRef Nick AM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, et al. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:276–80.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:484–8.PubMedCrossRef Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:484–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, et al. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:255–60.PubMedCrossRef Diaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, et al. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:255–60.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):584–8.PubMedCrossRef Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):584–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Iglesias DA, Ramirez PT. Role of minimally invasive surgery in staging of ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2011;12(3):217–29.CrossRef Iglesias DA, Ramirez PT. Role of minimally invasive surgery in staging of ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2011;12(3):217–29.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar PF, Levinson KL, Magrina J, et al. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: A Multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.007.PubMed Escobar PF, Levinson KL, Magrina J, et al. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: A Multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ygyno.​2014.​05.​007.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Fabrizi L, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2759–64.PubMedCrossRef Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, Baiocco E, Patrizi L, Fabrizi L, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2759–64.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Martino MA, Berger EA, Mcfetridge JT, et al. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):389–93.PubMedCrossRef Martino MA, Berger EA, Mcfetridge JT, et al. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):389–93.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Stine JE, Clarke-Pearson DL, Gehrig PA. Uterine Morcellation at the Time of Hysterectomy: Techniques, Risks, and Recommendations. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(7):415–25.PubMedCrossRef Stine JE, Clarke-Pearson DL, Gehrig PA. Uterine Morcellation at the Time of Hysterectomy: Techniques, Risks, and Recommendations. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(7):415–25.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gladwell M. Outliers: The Story of Success. 1st ed. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008. Gladwell M. Outliers: The Story of Success. 1st ed. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2008.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL. Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(8):1608–18.PubMedCrossRef Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL. Deliberate Practice and Performance in Music, Games, Sports, Education, and Professions: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(8):1608–18.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui NY, Galloway ML, Geller EJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1193–9.PubMedCrossRef Siddiqui NY, Galloway ML, Geller EJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1193–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Updates and Innovations
verfasst von
Pedro F. Escobar
Pilar E. Silva
Joshua A. Makhoul
Martin A. Martino
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports / Ausgabe 4/2014
Elektronische ISSN: 2161-3303
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-014-0101-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (A Fader, Section Editor)

Update on Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (A Fader, Section Editor)

Laparoscopic Management of Pelvic Masses in Pregnancy

Management of Menopause (K-E Huang, Section Editor)

DHEA supplementation in Menopause

Management of Menopause (K-E Huang, Section Editor)

Menopausal Hormonal Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (A Fader, Section Editor)

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.