Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2020

27.08.2019 | Original Research

SAVIOR ICU: sonification and vibrotactile interface for the operating room and intensive care unit

verfasst von: Kendall J. Burdick, Seiver K. Jorgensen, Taylor N. Combs, Megan O. Holmberg, Samantha P. Kultgen, Joseph J. Schlesinger

Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Alarm fatigue is an issue for healthcare providers in the intensive care unit, and may result from desensitization of overbearing and under-informing alarms. To directly increase the overall identification of medical alarms and potentially contribute to a downstream decrease in the prevalence of alarm fatigue, we propose advancing alarm sonification by combining auditory and tactile stimuli to create a multisensory alarm. Participants completed four trials—two multisensory (auditory and tactile) and two unisensory (auditory). Analysis compared the unisensory trials to the multisensory trials based on the percentage of correctly identified point of change, direction of change and identity of three physiological parameters (indicated by different instruments): heart rate (drums), blood pressure (piano), blood oxygenation (guitar). A repeated-measures of ANOVA yielded a significant improvement in performance for the multisensory group compared to the unisensory group (p < 0.05). Specifically, the multisensory group had better performance in correctly identifying parameter (p < 0.05) and point of change (p < 0.05) compared to the unisensory group. Participants demonstrated a higher accuracy of identification with the use of multisensory alarms. Therefore, multisensory alarms may relieve the auditory burden of the medical environment and increase the overall quality of care and patient safety.
Literatur
1.
Sendelbach S, Funk M. Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2013;24(4):378–86.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Couch C. How redesigning the abrasive alarms of hospital soundscapes can save lives.
3.
Kit S. ECRI’s Top 10 Health Technology Hazards for 2013. Health Devices. 2013;41(11):342–65.
4.
Casey S, Avalos G, Dowling M. Critical care nurses’ knowledge of alarm fatigue and practices towards alarms: a multicentre study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018;48:36–41.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kristensen MS, Edworthy J, Özcan Vieira E, Denham S. Alarm fatigue in the perception of medical soundscapes. In: European congress and exposition on noise control engineering, 2015, pp. 745–50.
6.
7.
Purbaugh T. Alarm fatigue: a roadmap for mitigating the cacophony of beeps. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014;33(1):4–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Cropp AJ, Woods LA, Raney D, Bredle DL. Name that tone: the proliferation of alarms in the intensive care unit. Chest. 1994;105(4):1217–20.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Hasanain B, Boyd AD, Bolton ML. Using model checking to detect simultaneous masking in medical alarms. IEEE Trans Hum–Mach Syst. 2016;46(2):174–85.CrossRef
10.
Kramer G, et al. Sonification report: status of the field and research agenda. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; 2010.
11.
Janata P, Childs E. Marketbuzz: sonification of real-time financial data. Georgia Institute of Technology; 2004.
12.
Barrass S, Kramer G. Using sonification. Multimed Syst. 1999;7(1):23–31.CrossRef
13.
14.
Fitch WT, Kramer G. Sonifying the body electric: superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. In: Santa FE Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity—proceedings volume, vol. 18. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co; 1994, p. 307.
15.
Hermann T. Taxonomy and definitions for sonification and auditory display. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on auditory display (ICAD 2008), 2008.
16.
Ballora M, Pennycook B, Ivanov PC, Glass L, Goldberger AL. Heart rate sonification: a new approach to medical diagnosis. Leonardo. 2004;37(1):41–6.CrossRef
17.
Wang J. Emergency healthcare workflow modeling and timeliness analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A. 2012;42(6):1323–31.CrossRef
18.
Kang Y, Li Z, Zhao Y, Qin J, Song W. A novel location strategy for minimizing monitors in vehicle emission remote sensing system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2018;48(4):500–10.CrossRef
19.
Nunes VT, Werner CML, Santoro FM. Dynamic process adaptation: a context-aware approach. IEEE; 2011, pp. 97–104.
20.
Ziat M, Wagner S, Frissen I. Haptic feedback to compensate for the absence of horizon cues during landing. In: International conference on human haptic sensing and touch enabled computer applications. Springer; 2016, pp. 47–54.
21.
22.
Aaltonen I, Laarni J. Field evaluation of a wearable multimodal soldier navigation system. Appl Ergon. 2017;63:79–90.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
25.
26.
Deb S, Claudio D. Alarm fatigue and its influence on staff performance. IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2015;5(3):183–96.CrossRef
27.
Torabizadeh C, Yousefinya A, Zand F, Rakhshan M, Fararooei M. A nurses’ alarm fatigue questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(6):1305–12.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Petersen EM, Costanzo CL. Assessment of clinical alarms influencing nurses’ perceptions of alarm fatigue. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36(1):36–44.PubMedCrossRef
29.
McCambridge J, De Bruin M, Witton J. The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Lee Y-C, Lee JD, Ng Boyle L. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption. Hum Factors. 2007;49(4):721–33.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C. Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transp Res F. 2005;8(6):397–412.CrossRef
32.
Wolpert RS. Recognition of melody, harmonic accompaniment, and instrumentation: musicians vs. nonmusicians. Music Percept Interdiscip J. 1990;8(1):95–105.CrossRef
33.
Schellenberg EG, Habashi P. Remembering the melody and timbre, forgetting the key and tempo. Mem Cogn. 2015;43(7):1021–31.CrossRef
34.
Siedenburg K, McAdams S. Short-term recognition of timbre sequences: music training, pitch variability, and timbral similarity. Music Percept Interdiscip J. 2018;36(1):24–39.CrossRef
35.
36.
37.
38.
Paterson E, Sanderson P, Paterson N, Loeb RG. Effectiveness of enhanced pulse oximetry sonifications for conveying oxygen saturation ranges: a laboratory comparison of five auditory displays. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(6):1224–30.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Alirezaee P, Girgis R, Kim T, Schlesinger JJ, Cooperstock JR. Did you Feel that? Developing novel multimodal alarms for high consequence clinical environments. Georgia Institute of Technology; 2017.
40.
Burdick K, Courtney M, Wallace MT, Baum Miller SH, Schlesinger JJ. Living and working in a multisensory world: from basic neuroscience to the hospital. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2019;3(1):2.CrossRef
41.
Eagle DM, Baunez C, Hutcheson DM, Lehmann O, Shah AP, Robbins TW. Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2007;18(1):178–88.PubMedCrossRef
42.
43.
Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(5):647–61.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Eva KW, Link CL, Lutfey KE, McKinlay JB. Swapping horses midstream: factors related to physicians’ changing their minds about a diagnosis. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2010;85(7):1112.CrossRef
45.
Royall DR, et al. Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;14(4):377–405.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Verbruggen F, Logan GD, Stevens MA. STOP-IT: windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(2):479–83.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Mauchly JW. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann Math Stat. 1940;11(2):204–9.CrossRef
48.
Ross LA, Saint-Amour D, Leavitt VM, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ. Do you see what I am saying? Exploring visual enhancement of speech comprehension in noisy environments. Cereb Cortex. 2006;17(5):1147–53.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Blum JR, Frissen I, Cooperstock JR. Improving haptic feedback on wearable devices through accelerometer measurements. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM; 2015, pp. 31–6.
Metadaten
Titel
SAVIOR ICU: sonification and vibrotactile interface for the operating room and intensive care unit
verfasst von
Kendall J. Burdick
Seiver K. Jorgensen
Taylor N. Combs
Megan O. Holmberg
Samantha P. Kultgen
Joseph J. Schlesinger
Publikationsdatum
27.08.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00381-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Research

A novel method for transpulmonary pressure estimation using fluctuation of central venous pressure

Original Research

Feasibility evaluation of non-invasive cardiac function technology during echocardiography-based cardiac stress testing

Review Paper

Does nociception monitor-guided anesthesia affect opioid consumption? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Commentary

Shedding light on perioperative hemodynamic monitoring

Original Research

Facing SpO2 and SaO2 discrepancies in ICU patients: is the perfusion index helpful?

Letter to the Editor

Capnography-sample line leak and incremental positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP); an interesting interplay

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren
Bildnachweise