Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Skeletal Radiology
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2021

02.08.2020 | Review Article

Soft tissue pathology for the radiologist: a tumor board primer with 2020 WHO classification update

verfasst von: Karin J. Kuhn, Jeffrey M. Cloutier, Robert D. Boutin, Robert Steffner, Geoffrey Riley

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Radiologists serve an important role in the diagnosis and staging of soft tissue tumors, often through participation in multidisciplinary tumor board teams. While an important function of the radiologist is to review pertinent imaging and assist in the differential diagnosis, a critical role is to ensure that there is concordance between the imaging and the pathologic diagnosis. This requires a basic understanding of the pathology of soft tissue tumors, particularly in the case of diagnostic dilemmas or incongruent imaging and histologic features. This work is intended to provide an overview of soft tissue pathology for the radiologist to optimize participation in multidisciplinary orthopedic oncology tumor boards, allowing for contribution to management decisions with expertise beyond image interpretation.
Literatur
1.
Goldblum J, Weiss S, Folpe AL, editors. Enzinger and Weiss’s soft tissue tumors. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 1–14.
2.
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(1):8–29.CrossRef
3.
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th; vol. 3).
4.
Clark MA, Thomas JM. Delay in referral to a specialist soft-tissue sarcoma unit. Eur J Surg Onc. 2005;31:443–8.CrossRef
5.
Ray-Coquard I, Thiesse P, Ranchere-Vince D, et al. Conformity to clinical practice guideline, multidisciplinary management and outcomes of treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:307–15.CrossRef
6.
Clasby R, Tilling K, Smith MA, Fletcher CD. Variable management of soft tissue sarcoma: regional audit with implications for specialist care. Br J Surg. 1997;84(12):1692–6.PubMed
7.
Blay JY, Soibinet P, Penel N, et al. Improved survival using specialized multidisciplinary board in sarcoma patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2852–9.CrossRef
8.
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD, Wessell DE, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria soft-tissue masses. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(5S):S189–97.CrossRef
9.
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 39–41.
10.
Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F, et al. Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(12):2320–30.CrossRef
11.
Berquist TH, Ehman RL, King BF, Hodgman CG, Ilstrup DM. Value of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue masses: study of 95 lesions. AJR. 1990;155(6):1251–5.CrossRef
12.
Sundaram M, McGuire MH, Herbold DR. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue masses: an evaluation of fifty-three histologically proven tumors. Magn Reson Imaging. 1988;6:237–48.CrossRef
13.
Kransdorf MJ, Jelinek JS, Moser RP, Utz JA, Brower AC, Hudson TM, et al. Soft-tissue masses: diagnosis using MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:541–7.CrossRef
14.
Crim JR, Seeger LL, Yao L, Chandnani V, Eckardt JJ. Diagnosis of soft-tissue masses with MR imaging: can benign masses be differentiated from malignant ones? Radiology. 1992;185(2):581–6.CrossRef
15.
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Imaging of soft tissue masses. In: Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD, editors. Imaging of soft tissue tumors: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 46–8.
16.
Hoeber I, Spillane AJ, Fisher C, Thomas JM. Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8(1):80–7.CrossRef
17.
Fisher C, Montgomery EA, Thway K. Biopsy interpretation series: biopsy interpretation of soft tissue tumors. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 1–20.
18.
Singer S, Tap WD, Kirsch DG, Crago AM. Soft tissue sarcoma. In: DeVita VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, editors. Hellman, and Rosenberg’s principles and practice of oncology. 11th ed: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2019. p. 1401–50.
19.
Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: an update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):200–29.CrossRef
20.
Salah S, Lewin J, Amir E, Abdul RA. Tumor necrosis and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in soft tissue sarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;69:1–10.CrossRef
21.
Berg W, Hruban R, Kumar D, Singh H, Brem R, Gatewood O. Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy. Radiographics. 1996;16:1111–30.CrossRef
22.
Mihalik JE, Krupka L, Davenport R, Tucker L, Toevs C, Smith RS. The rate of imaging-histologic discordance of benign breast disease: a multidisciplinary approach to the management of discordance at a large university-based hospital. Am J Surg. 2010;199:319–23.CrossRef
23.
24.
van Vilet M, Kliffen M, Krestin GP, van Dijke CF. Soft tissue sarcomas at a glance: clinical, histological, and MR imaging features of malignant extremity soft tissue tumors. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(6):1499–511.CrossRef
25.
Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ. Radiologic evaluation of soft tissue tumors. In: Miettinen M, editor. Modern Soft Tissue Pathology: Tumors and Non-Neoplastic Conditions: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 11–40.
26.
Baheti AD, O’Malley RB, Kim S, Keraliya AR, Tirumani SH, Ramaiya NH, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas: an update for radiologists based on the revised 2013 World Health Organization classification. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(5):924–32.CrossRef
27.
Khoo M, Pressney I, Hargunani R, Saifuddin A. Small, superficial, indeterminate soft-tissue lesions as suspected sarcomas: is primary excision biopsy suitable? Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(7):919–24.CrossRef
28.
Sung KS, Seo SW, Shon MS. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1701–6.CrossRef
29.
Meek RD, Mills MK, Hanrahan CJ, Beckett BR, Leake RL, Allen H, et al. Pearls and pitfalls for soft-tissue and bone biopsies: a cross-institutional review. Radiographics. 2020;40(1):266–90.CrossRef
30.
Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Compartmental anatomy and biopsy planning. In: Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD, editors. Imaging of soft tissue tumors: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 745–68.
31.
Graham DS, Russell TA, Eckardt MA, Motamedi K, Seeger LL, Singh AS, et al. Oncologic accuracy of image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy of peripheral nerve sheath tumors at a high-volume sarcoma center. Am J Clin Oncol. 2019;42(10):739–43.CrossRef
32.
Dabbs D, editor. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry: theranostic and genomic applications. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2019. p. 1–12.
33.
Oliner JD, Saiki AY, Caenepeel S. The role of MDM2 amplification and overexpression in tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6:a026336.CrossRef
34.
Perry K. Soft tissue pathology for clinicians. Gewerbestrasse: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 15–8.CrossRef
35.
Hanson KF, Birinyi P, Walker R, Raptis C, Chenock R, Coppens J, et al. Melanoma mimicking malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with spread to the cerebellopontine angle: utility of next-generation sequencing in diagnosis. Case Rep Pathol. 2018;9410465.
36.
ISSVA Classification of Vascular Anomalies ©2018 International Society of the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Available at “issva.​org/​classification.” Accessed March 23, 2020.
37.
Drilon A, Laetsch T, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):731–9.CrossRef
38.
Pierron G, Tirode F, Lucchesi C, et al. A new subtype of bone sarcoma defined by BCOR-CCNB3 gene fusion. Nat Genet. 2012;44(4):461–6.CrossRef
39.
Singer S, Tap W, Schaefer IM, Fletcher CD. Sarcomas with CIC-rearrangements are a distinct pathologic entity with aggressive outcome: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 115 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(7):941–9.CrossRef
40.
Capper D, Jones DT, Sill M, et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018;555(7697):469–74.CrossRef
41.
Coudray N, Ocampo PS, Sakellaropoulos T, et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1559–67.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Soft tissue pathology for the radiologist: a tumor board primer with 2020 WHO classification update
verfasst von
Karin J. Kuhn
Jeffrey M. Cloutier
Robert D. Boutin
Robert Steffner
Geoffrey Riley
Publikationsdatum
02.08.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03567-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Skeletal Radiology 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Scientific Article

Accuracy of craniocervical measurements on CT for identifying partial or complete craniocervical ligament injuries in pediatric patients

Review Article

A review of imaging of surface sarcomas of bone

Test Yourself: Question

Test yourself question: right third toe swelling

Scientific Article

Accurate prediction of lumbar microdecompression level with an automated MRI grading system

Scientific Article

Obese and overweight individuals have greater knee synovial inflammation and associated structural and cartilage compositional degeneration: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Technical Report

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: differentiating soft tissue implants and fillers used in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise