Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 3/2013

01.03.2013 | Clinical Report

Robot-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Super Obese Patients: A Comparative Study

verfasst von: Nicolas C. Buchs, François Pugin, Gilles Chassot, Francesco Volonte, Pascale Koutny-Fong, Monika E. Hagen, Philippe Morel

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Superobese patients (SO) (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2) represent a real surgical challenge and the best management remains debatable. While the safety of a laparoscopic approach has been questioned for this population, robotics has been introduced in the armamentarium of the bariatric surgeon, yet its role remains poorly assessed, especially for a very high BMI. The study aim is thus to report our experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for SO. From July 2006 to May 2012, 288 consecutive robot-assisted RYGB procedures have been performed at a single institution. All data were collected prospectively in a dedicated database. Among those patients, 41 were SO (14.2 %). All the peri- and postoperative parameters were compared to the morbidly obese (MO) group (BMI < 50). Data have been reviewed retrospectively. The SO group presented a higher ASA score and more male patients. The operative time was similar between both groups, yet there were more conversions in the SO group (two versus one for MO; p = 0.05). The morbidity and mortality rates were similar between both groups. The length of stay was longer for the SO population (7 vs. 6 days; p = 0.03). The percent BMI loss was similar at 1 year (34 vs. 34 %; p = 1), but the percent excess BMI loss was higher for the MO group (83 vs. 65 % for the SO group; p = 0.0007). Robot-assisted RYGB can be performed safely for SO, with complication rates and functional results at 1 year comparable to MO, yet this approach for SO has been associated with a slightly increased conversion rate and length of stay.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI > 50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):858–63.PubMedCrossRef Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI > 50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):858–63.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMaria EJ, Schauer P, Patterson E, et al. The optimal surgical management of the super-obese patient: the debate. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Hollywood, April 13–16, 2005. Surg Innov. 2005; 12(2):107–21. DeMaria EJ, Schauer P, Patterson E, et al. The optimal surgical management of the super-obese patient: the debate. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Hollywood, April 13–16, 2005. Surg Innov. 2005; 12(2):107–21.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145–79.PubMedCrossRef Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145–79.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakarla VR, Nandipati K, Lalla M, et al. Are laparoscopic bariatric procedures safe in superobese (BMI >/=50 kg/m2) patients? An NSQIP data analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):452–8.PubMedCrossRef Kakarla VR, Nandipati K, Lalla M, et al. Are laparoscopic bariatric procedures safe in superobese (BMI >/=50 kg/m2) patients? An NSQIP data analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):452–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukherjee S, Devalia K, Rahman MG, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as a bridge to a second bariatric procedure in superobese patients—a single institution experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(2):140–4.PubMedCrossRef Mukherjee S, Devalia K, Rahman MG, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as a bridge to a second bariatric procedure in superobese patients—a single institution experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(2):140–4.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Weight loss is more sustained after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; Mar 3. Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Weight loss is more sustained after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; Mar 3.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):160–6.PubMedCrossRef Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):160–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Torchia F, Mancuso V, Civitelli S, et al. LapBand System in super-superobese patients (>60 kg/m(2)): 4-year results. Obes Surg. 2009;19(9):1211–5.PubMedCrossRef Torchia F, Mancuso V, Civitelli S, et al. LapBand System in super-superobese patients (>60 kg/m(2)): 4-year results. Obes Surg. 2009;19(9):1211–5.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. Results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese vs superobese patients: similar body weight loss, correction of comorbidities, and improvement of quality of life. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):312–8. discussion 318.PubMedCrossRef Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. Results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese vs superobese patients: similar body weight loss, correction of comorbidities, and improvement of quality of life. Arch Surg. 2009;144(4):312–8. discussion 318.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Farkas DT, Vemulapalli P, Haider A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective in patients with a BMI > or =60. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):486–93.PubMedCrossRef Farkas DT, Vemulapalli P, Haider A, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is safe and effective in patients with a BMI > or =60. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):486–93.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1116–21.PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1116–21.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.PubMedCrossRef Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.PubMedCrossRef Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35(3):637–42.PubMedCrossRef Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35(3):637–42.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Artuso D, Wayne M, Grossi R. Use of robotics during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. JSLS. 2005;9(3):266–8.PubMed Artuso D, Wayne M, Grossi R. Use of robotics during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. JSLS. 2005;9(3):266–8.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudan R, Bennett KM, Jacobs DO, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):940–5.PubMedCrossRef Sudan R, Bennett KM, Jacobs DO, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):940–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(4):295–9.PubMedCrossRef Ayloo S, Buchs NC, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy for super-morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011;21(4):295–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, et al. Value of performing routine postoperative liquid contrast swallow studies following robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13556.PubMed Buchs NC, Bucher P, Pugin F, et al. Value of performing routine postoperative liquid contrast swallow studies following robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13556.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Swiss Society for the Study of Morbid Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (SMOB). Directives pour le traitement chirurgical de l'obésité. www.smob.ch 2010. Swiss Society for the Study of Morbid Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (SMOB). Directives pour le traitement chirurgical de l'obésité. www.​smob.​ch 2010.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Deitel M, Greenstein RJ. Recommendations for reporting weight loss. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):159–60.PubMedCrossRef Deitel M, Greenstein RJ. Recommendations for reporting weight loss. Obes Surg. 2003;13(2):159–60.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):611–9.PubMed Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):611–9.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellum JM, Chikunguwo SM, Maher JW, et al. Long-term results of malabsorptive distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):189–93.PubMedCrossRef Kellum JM, Chikunguwo SM, Maher JW, et al. Long-term results of malabsorptive distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):189–93.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould JC, Garren MJ, Boll V, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: risks vs. benefits up to two years following surgery in super-super obese patients. Surgery. 2006;140(4):524–9. discussion 529–31.PubMedCrossRef Gould JC, Garren MJ, Boll V, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: risks vs. benefits up to two years following surgery in super-super obese patients. Surgery. 2006;140(4):524–9. discussion 529–31.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, et al. The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):228–36.PubMedCrossRef Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, et al. The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):228–36.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz ML, Drew RL, Chazin-Caldie M. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: preoperative determinants of prolonged operative times, conversion to open gastric bypasses, and postoperative complications. Obes Surg. 2003;13(5):734–8.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz ML, Drew RL, Chazin-Caldie M. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: preoperative determinants of prolonged operative times, conversion to open gastric bypasses, and postoperative complications. Obes Surg. 2003;13(5):734–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Weber P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: defining the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(3):405–8.PubMedCrossRef Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Weber P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: defining the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(3):405–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gentileschi P. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary operation for morbid obesity: experience with 200 patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:801325.PubMed Gentileschi P. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary operation for morbid obesity: experience with 200 patients. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:801325.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(8):2498–504.PubMedCrossRef D'Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(8):2498–504.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2012; Apr 16. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2012; Apr 16.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2739–46.PubMedCrossRef Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg. 2011;35(12):2739–46.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas. 2011;40(8):1264–70.PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas. 2011;40(8):1264–70.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; Jan 16. Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012; Jan 16.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4):393–400.PubMedCrossRef Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4):393–400.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–03.PubMedCrossRef Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–03.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.PubMedCrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Addeo P, Buchs NC. Robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass: are they comparable? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):576–7.PubMedCrossRef Addeo P, Buchs NC. Robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass: are they comparable? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):576–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Super Obese Patients: A Comparative Study
verfasst von
Nicolas C. Buchs
François Pugin
Gilles Chassot
Francesco Volonte
Pascale Koutny-Fong
Monika E. Hagen
Philippe Morel
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0824-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Obesity Surgery 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.