nach oben

Updates in Surgery

Erschienen in:

04.01.2021 | Review Article

Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy

verfasst von: Yoo Min Kim, Woo Jin Hyung

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Robotic systems were developed to overcome limitations of laparoscopic surgery with its mechanical advantages. Along with the technical advances, robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is increasing. However, the evidence regarding safety and efficacy for robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is not mature yet. Although studies are limited, it is evident that robotic gastrectomy has a longer operation and less blood loss compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Studies revealed long-term oncological outcomes after robotic gastrectomy was comparable to those after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Taken together, robotic gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection is suggested as a safe procedure with equivalent short- and long-term oncologic outcomes to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. However, high cost is the most significant barrier to justify robotic surgery as a routine and standard treatment for patients with gastric cancer. In the meanwhile, robotic surgery will be expansively used as long as technologic developments continue.

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492CrossRefPubMed

Kinoshita T (2020) Minimally invasive approaches for early gastric cancer in East Asia: current status and future perspective. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:20. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2019.10.08CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hoshino N, Murakami K, Hida K, Hisamori S, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Sakai Y (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with quality assessment of current evidence. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00793-8CrossRefPubMed

Son T, Hyung WJ (2016) Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):727–735. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, Kim W, Kim HI, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Hur H, Kong SH, Cho GS, Kim JJ, Park DJ, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Kim JW, Lee JH, Kim MC, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study G (2019) Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 270(6):983–991. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217CrossRef

Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Hyung WJ, Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study G (2019) Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5(4):506–513. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727CrossRef

Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34(12):1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215CrossRefPubMed

Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Wang K, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Hu Y, Liu H, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Liu F, Li Z, Zhao G, Yang K, Liu C, Li H, Chen P, Ji J, Li G, Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study G (2019) Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the cLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321(20):1983–1992. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359CrossRef

Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada T, Bando E, Ito S, Takagi M, Takagane A, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Yoshikawa T, Terashima M, Sasako M (2020) Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(2):142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30332-2CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH (2005) Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 11(47):7508–7511. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Jin SH, Kim DY, Kim H, Jeong IH, Kim MW, Cho YK, Han SU (2007) Multidimensional learning curve in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 21(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0634-3CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z, Park YK (2014) Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21(9):2994–3001. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3666-xCrossRefPubMed

13.

Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, Shin DJ, Ahn HS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH (2016) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 19(1):264–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0447-yCrossRefPubMed

14.

Hyung WJ, Song C, Cheong JH, Choi SH, Noh SH (2007) Factors influencing operation time of laparoscopy-assisted distal subtotal gastrectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 initial cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 33(3):314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.010CrossRefPubMed

15.

Navaratnam A, Abdul-Muhsin H, Humphreys M (2018) Updates in urologic robot assisted surgery. F1000Res. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15480.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Shiroki R, Fukami N, Fukaya K, Kusaka M, Natsume T, Ichihara T, Toyama H (2016) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Superiority over laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 23(2):122–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13001CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wright GP, Zureikat AH (2016) Development of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an evidence-based systematic review of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 20(9):1658–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1CrossRefPubMed

18.

Chang EHE, Kim HY, Koh YW, Chung WY (2017) Overview of robotic thyroidectomy. Gland Surg 6(3):218–228. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.03.18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Biffi R, Luca F, Bianchi PP, Cenciarelli S, Petz W, Monsellato I, Valvo M, Cossu ML, Ghezzi TL, Shmaissany K (2016) Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: current status and perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 22(2):546–556. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Hoshino N, Sakamoto T, Hida K, Sakai Y (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with quality assessment of current evidence. Surg Today 49(7):556–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-1763-yCrossRefPubMed

21.

Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23(6):1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4CrossRefPubMed

22.

Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249(6):927–932. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73CrossRefPubMed

23.

Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, Kim YM, Kim J, Noh SH (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastric Cancer 13(3):136–148. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.3.136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ, Tong Y, Park SS (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 100(12):1566–1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9242CrossRefPubMed

25.

Duan BS, Zhao J, Xie LF, Wang Y (2017) Robotic verse laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a pooled analysis of 11 individual studies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27(3):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000410CrossRefPubMed

26.

Wang Y, Zhao X, Song Y, Cai A, Xi H, Chen L (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(48):e8797. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008797CrossRef

27.

Qiu H, Ai JH, Shi J, Shan RF, Yu DJ (2019) Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther 15(7):1450–1463. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_798_18CrossRefPubMed

28.

Shibasaki S, Suda K, Obama K, Yoshida M, Uyama I (2019) Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer? Surg Today. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01875-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Marano L, Fusario D, Savelli V, Verre L, Neri A, Marrelli D, Roviello F (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: protocol for umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ Open 10(2):e033634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Hyung WJ, Cheong JH, Kim J, Chen J, Choi SH, Noh SH (2004) Application of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 85(4):181–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20018CrossRefPubMed

31.

Pak KH, Hyung WJ, Son T, Obama K, Woo Y, Kim HI, An JY, Kim JW, Cheong JH, Choi SH, Noh SH (2012) Long-term oncologic outcomes of 714 consecutive laparoscopic gastrectomies for gastric cancer: results from the 7-year experience of a single institute. Surg Endosc 26(1):130–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1838-3CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hyung WJ, Lim JS, Song J, Choi SH, Noh SH (2008) Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):e6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.027CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Lee YJ, Park JM, Kim JJ, Kwon OK, Kong SH, Kim HI, Lee HJ, Kim W, Ryu SW, Jin SH, Oh SJ, Ryu KW, Kim MC, Ahn HS, Park YK, Kim YH, Hwang SH, Kim JW, Cho GS (2019) A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03. Gastric Cancer 22(1):214–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0864-4CrossRefPubMed

34.

Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association DWG, Review P (2019) Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 19(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8CrossRef

35.

Alhossaini RM, Altamran AA, Seo WJ, Hyung WJ (2017) Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current evidence. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 1(2):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12020CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Costanzi A, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C, De Martini P, Pugliese F (2010) Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival. Surg Endosc 24(10):2594–2602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1014-1CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ (2010) Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc 24(3):610–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0618-9CrossRefPubMed

38.

Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2012) Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg 99(12):1681–1687. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8924CrossRefPubMed

39.

Kang BH, Xuan Y, Hur H, Ahn CW, Cho YK, Han SU (2012) Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the learning curve of robotic surgery. J Gastric Cancer 12(3):156–163. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2012.12.3.156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, Cho SI, Jang YJ, Kim DH, Kim JH, Park SH, Mok YJ, Park SS (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20(4):1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6CrossRefPubMed

41.

Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2014) Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 28(9):2606–2615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0CrossRefPubMed

42.

Noshiro H, Ikeda O, Urata M (2014) Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone. Surg Endosc 28(4):1180–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3304-xCrossRefPubMed

43.

Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS, Li AF, Chiou SH, Wu CW, Shyr YM (2014) Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Han DS, Suh YS, Ahn HS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Yang HK (2015) Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22(7):2323–2328. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4204-6CrossRefPubMed

45.

Park JY, Ryu KW, Reim D, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Rho JY, Choi IJ, Kim YW (2015) Robot-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial in viscerally obese patients compared to laparoscopic gastrectomy? World J Surg 39(7):1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2998-4CrossRefPubMed

46.

Lee J, Kim YM, Woo Y, Obama K, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2015) Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Surg Endosc 29(11):3251–3260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4069-1CrossRefPubMed

47.

Suda K, Man IM, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2015) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29(3):673–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0CrossRefPubMed

48.

Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ (2016) Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 263(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249CrossRefPubMed

49.

Okumura N, Son T, Kim YM, Kim HI, An JY, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2016) Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly. Gastric Cancer 19(4):1125–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0560-6CrossRefPubMed

50.

Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Trallori G, Ortolani M, Paoli B, Macri G, Lami G, Mallardi B, Badii B, Staderini F, Qirici E, Taddei A, Ringressi MN, Messerini L, Novelli L, Bagnoli S, Bonanomi A, Foppa C, Skalamera I, Fiorenza G, Perigli G (2016) Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective comparative mono-institutional study. BMC Surg 16(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0180-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Cui J, Bian S, Zhang K, Wang N, Huang X, Chen L (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc 30(2):574–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4241-7CrossRefPubMed

52.

Parisi A, Reim D, Borghi F, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cianchi F, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Gagniere J, Pernazza G, D’Imporzano S, Zhou YB, Azagra JS, Facy O, Brower ST, Jiang ZW, Zang L, Isik A, Gemini A, Trastulli S, Novotny A, Marano A, Liu T, Annecchiarico M, Badii B, Arcuri G, Avanzolini A, Leblebici M, Pezet D, Cao SG, Goergen M, Zhang S, Palazzini G, D’Andrea V, Desiderio J (2017) Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: a comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery. World J Gastroenterol 23(13):2376–2384. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Pan HF, Wang G, Liu J, Liu XX, Zhao K, Tang XF, Jiang ZW (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27(6):428–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000469CrossRefPubMed

54.

Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, Cho M, Lim SH, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI (2017) Surgical outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24(7):1770–1777. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5851-1CrossRefPubMed

55.

Li Z, Li J, Li B, Bai B, Liu Y, Lian B, Zhao Q (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Manag Res 10:705–714. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S161007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Hikage M, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M (2018) Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for cT1 gastric cancer. World J Surg 42(6):1803–1810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4345-4CrossRefPubMed

57.

Liu HB, Wang WJ, Li HT, Han XP, Su L, Wei DW, Cao TB, Yu JP, Jiao ZY (2018) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 55:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.015CrossRefPubMed

58.

Lu J, Zheng HL, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Huang CM, Zheng CH (2018) A propensity score-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: oncological, cost, and surgical stress analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 22(7):1152–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3785-yCrossRefPubMed

59.

Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ (2018) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 21(2):285–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0740-7CrossRefPubMed

60.

Gao Y, Xi H, Qiao Z, Li J, Zhang K, Xie T, Shen W, Cui J, Wei B, Chen L (2019) Comparison of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc 33(2):528–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6327-5CrossRefPubMed

61.

Shin HJ, Son SY, Wang B, Roh CK, Hur H, Han SU (2020) Long-term comparison of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-weighted analysis of 2084 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003845CrossRefPubMed

62.

Bobo Z, Xin W, Jiang L, Quan W, Liang B, Xiangbing D, Ziqiang W (2019) Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies. Surg Endosc 33(4):1033–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06648-zCrossRefPubMed

63.

Park JM, Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Hyung WJ, Ryu KW (2016) Who may benefit from robotic gastrectomy?: a subgroup analysis of multicenter prospective comparative study data on robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(12):1944–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.012CrossRefPubMed

64.

Xiao H, Quan H, Pan S, Yin B, Luo W, Huang G, Ouyang Y (2018) Impact of peri-operative blood transfusion on post-operative infections after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis focusing on the timing, amount of transfusion and role of leukocyte depletion. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144(6):1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2630-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Jiang W, Fang YJ, Wu XJ, Wang FL, Lu ZH, Zhang RX, Ding PR, Fan WH, Pan ZZ, De-Sen W (2013) Intraoperative blood loss independently predicts survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. PLoS ONE 8(10):e76125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076125CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Liu H, Kinoshita T, Tonouchi A, Kaito A, Tokunaga M (2019) What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer? Surg Endosc 33(1):192–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6294-xCrossRefPubMed

67.

Alhossaini RM, Altamran AA, Cho M, Roh CK, Seo WJ, Choi S, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ (2020) Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 34(2):847–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06838-3CrossRefPubMed

68.

Wang G, Jiang Z, Zhao J, Liu J, Zhang S, Zhao K, Feng X, Li J (2016) Assessing the safety and efficacy of full robotic gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Oncol 113(4):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24146CrossRefPubMed

69.

Wang J, Luo Y, Wang Q, Bai J, Liao Q, Feng X, Zhang G, Tao K, Ji G, Li Y (2020) Evaluation of the application of laparoscopy in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastric cancer: a Chinese multicenter analysis. Ann Transl Med 8(8):543. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2556CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Li Z, Wang Q, Li B, Bai B, Zhao Q (2017) Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1271-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Uyama I, Suda K, Nakauchi M, Kinoshita T, Noshiro H, Takiguchi S, Ehara K, Obama K, Kuwabara S, Okabe H, Terashima M (2019) Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study. Gastric Cancer 22(2):377–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-00906-8CrossRefPubMed

72.

Yang K, Cho M, Roh CK, Seo WJ, Choi S, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ (2019) Robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 33(7):2357–2363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06772-4CrossRefPubMed

73.

Seo HS, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY (2015) Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy. J Surg Res 194(2):361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.022CrossRefPubMed

74.

Guerra F, Giuliani G, Formisano G, Bianchi PP, Patriti A, Coratti A (2018) Pancreatic complications after conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy versus robotic radical gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28(10):1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0159CrossRefPubMed

75.

Nakauchi M, Suda K, Susumu S, Kadoya S, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I (2016) Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 30(12):5444–5452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4904-zCrossRefPubMed

76.

Park SS, Kim MC, Park MS, Hyung WJ (2012) Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 26(1):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1828-5CrossRefPubMed

77.

Kim HI, Park MS, Song KJ, Woo Y, Hyung WJ (2014) Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(10):1346–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.011CrossRefPubMed

78.

Kwon IG, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ (2019) Fluorescent lymphography-guided lymphadenectomy during robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. JAMA Surg 154(2):150–158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4267CrossRefPubMed

79.

Roh CK, Choi S, Seo WJ, Cho M, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ (2020) Indocyanine green fluorescence lymphography during gastrectomy after initial endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 107(6):712–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11438CrossRefPubMed

80.

Kim YM, Lim JS, Kim JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2010) Image-based approach for surgical resection of gastric submucosal tumors. J Gastric Cancer 10(4):188–195. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2010.10.4.188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Kim M, Son SY, Cui LH, Shin HJ, Hur H, Han SU (2017) Real-time vessel navigation using indocyanine green fluorescence during robotic or laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 17(2):145–153. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy
verfasst von: Yoo Min Kim
Woo Jin Hyung
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2021
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00958-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver

Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of multiple worldwide centers

A comparative study of end-to-end pancreatic anastomosis versus pancreaticojejunostomy after robotic central pancreatectomy

State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy

Impact of body mass index on the early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Feasibility of robotic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes of 161 consecutive patients

Update Chirurgie