Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2022

11.11.2021 | Review

Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

verfasst von: Ding Huang, Jingyi Shen, Jiaze Hong, Yi Zhang, Senjie Dai, Nannan Du, Mengting Zhang, Daxin Guo

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) improves colonoscopy outcome metrics i.e. adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR).

Methods

Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library to find all published research before July 2021 that has compared AI-aided colonoscopy with routine colonoscopy (RC) for detection of adenoma and polyp.

Results

This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with 6629 individuals in AI-aided (n = 3300) and routine (n = 3329) groups. The results showed that both ADR (RR, 1.43; P < 0.001) and PDR (RR, 1.44; P < 0.001) using AI-aided endoscopy were significantly greater when compared with RC. The adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC) (WMD, 0.25; P = 0.009), polyps detected per colonoscopy (PPC) (WMD, 0.52; P < 0.001), and sessile serrated lesions detected per colonoscopy (SSLPC) (RR, 1.53; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the AI-aided group compared with the RC group. Subgroup analysis based on size, location, and shape of adenomas and polyps demonstrated that, except for in the cecum and pedunculated adenomas or polyps, the AI-aided groups of the other subgroups are more advantageous. Withdrawal time was longer in the AI-aided group when biopsies were included, while withdrawal time excluding biopsy time showed no significant difference.

Conclusions

AI-aided polyp detection system significantly increases lesion detection rate. In addition, lesion detection by AI is hardly affected by factors such as size, location, and shape.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ et al (2018) Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 68(4):250–281CrossRef Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, Flowers CR, Guerra CE, LaMonte SJ et al (2018) Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 68(4):250–281CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Click B, Pinsky PF, Hickey T, Doroudi M, Schoen RE (2018) Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence. JAMA 319(19):2021–2031CrossRef Click B, Pinsky PF, Hickey T, Doroudi M, Schoen RE (2018) Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence. JAMA 319(19):2021–2031CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher RH (2017) Colonoscopy outreach increased CRC screening more than FIT outreach; both were better than usual care. Ann Intern Med 167(12):Jc65 Fletcher RH (2017) Colonoscopy outreach increased CRC screening more than FIT outreach; both were better than usual care. Ann Intern Med 167(12):Jc65
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M (2014) Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Bmj 348:g2467 Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M (2014) Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Bmj 348:g2467
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz M, Thoguluva CV (2020) Improving the ADR: Narrow Band. Broad Benefits Dig Dis Sci 65(6):1586–1587CrossRef Aziz M, Thoguluva CV (2020) Improving the ADR: Narrow Band. Broad Benefits Dig Dis Sci 65(6):1586–1587CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohan BP, Facciorusso A, Khan SR, Chandan S, Kassab LL, Gkolfakis P et al (2020) Real-time computer aided colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. E Clinical Medicine 29–30:100622 Mohan BP, Facciorusso A, Khan SR, Chandan S, Kassab LL, Gkolfakis P et al (2020) Real-time computer aided colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. E Clinical Medicine 29–30:100622
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J et al (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362(19):1795–1803CrossRef Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J et al (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362(19):1795–1803CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA et al (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370(14):1298–1306CrossRef Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA et al (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370(14):1298–1306CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X et al (2019) Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 156(6):1661–74.e11CrossRef Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X et al (2019) Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 156(6):1661–74.e11CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB et al (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81(1):31–53CrossRef Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB et al (2015) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 81(1):31–53CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinsard DG, Mori Y, Misawa M, Kudo SE, Rastogi A, Bagci U et al (2019) Quality assurance of computer-aided detection and diagnosis in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 90(1):55–63CrossRef Vinsard DG, Mori Y, Misawa M, Kudo SE, Rastogi A, Bagci U et al (2019) Quality assurance of computer-aided detection and diagnosis in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 90(1):55–63CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Barua I, Vinsard DG, Jodal HC, Løberg M, Kalager M, Holme Ø et al (2021) Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 53(3):277–284CrossRef Barua I, Vinsard DG, Jodal HC, Løberg M, Kalager M, Holme Ø et al (2021) Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 53(3):277–284CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65-94CrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151(4):W65-94CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu F, Hong J, Du N, Wang Y, Chen J, He Y et al (2021) Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer/esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem Wu F, Hong J, Du N, Wang Y, Chen J, He Y et al (2021) Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer/esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj 343:d5928 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj 343:d5928
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J, Mu G, Shen L, Liu J et al (2020) Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(4):352–361CrossRef Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J, Mu G, Shen L, Liu J et al (2020) Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(4):352–361CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamba S, Tamai N, Saitoh I, Matsui H, Horiuchi H, Kobayashi M et al (2021) Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 56(8):746–757CrossRef Kamba S, Tamai N, Saitoh I, Matsui H, Horiuchi H, Kobayashi M et al (2021) Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 56(8):746–757CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu P, Wang P, Glissen Brown JR, Berzin TM, Zhou G, Liu W et al (2020) The single-monitor trial: an embedded CADe system increased adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284820979165PubMedPubMedCentral Liu P, Wang P, Glissen Brown JR, Berzin TM, Zhou G, Liu W et al (2020) The single-monitor trial: an embedded CADe system increased adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284820979165PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu WN, Zhang YY, Bian XQ, Wang LJ, Yang Q, Zhang XD et al (2020) Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial-intelligence-aided colonoscopy. Saudi J Gastroenterol 26(1):13–19CrossRef Liu WN, Zhang YY, Bian XQ, Wang LJ, Yang Q, Zhang XD et al (2020) Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial-intelligence-aided colonoscopy. Saudi J Gastroenterol 26(1):13–19CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E et al (2020) Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 159(2):512–20.e7CrossRef Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E et al (2020) Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 159(2):512–20.e7CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen P, Li WZ, Li JX, Pei ZC, Luo YX, Mu JB et al (2021) Real-time use of a computer-aided system for polyp detection during colonoscopy, an ambispective study. J Dig Dis 22(5):256–262CrossRef Shen P, Li WZ, Li JX, Pei ZC, Luo YX, Mu JB et al (2021) Real-time use of a computer-aided system for polyp detection during colonoscopy, an ambispective study. J Dig Dis 22(5):256–262CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Su JR, Li Z, Shao XJ, Ji CR, Ji R, Zhou RC et al (2020) Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 91(2):415–24.e4CrossRef Su JR, Li Z, Shao XJ, Ji CR, Ji R, Zhou RC et al (2020) Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 91(2):415–24.e4CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang P, Berzin TM, Glissen Brown JR, Bharadwaj S, Becq A, Xiao X et al (2019) Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study. Gut 68(10):1813–1819CrossRef Wang P, Berzin TM, Glissen Brown JR, Bharadwaj S, Becq A, Xiao X et al (2019) Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study. Gut 68(10):1813–1819CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang P, Liu P, Glissen Brown JR, Berzin TM, Zhou G, Lei S et al (2020) Lower adenoma miss rate of computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy vs routine white-light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study. Gastroenterology 159(4):1252–61.e5CrossRef Wang P, Liu P, Glissen Brown JR, Berzin TM, Zhou G, Lei S et al (2020) Lower adenoma miss rate of computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy vs routine white-light colonoscopy in a prospective tandem study. Gastroenterology 159(4):1252–61.e5CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang P, Liu X, Berzin TM, Glissen Brown JR, Liu P, Zhou C et al (2020) Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(4):343–351CrossRef Wang P, Liu X, Berzin TM, Glissen Brown JR, Liu P, Zhou C et al (2020) Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(4):343–351CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CK, Park DI, Lee SH, Hwangbo Y, Eun CS, Han DS et al (2011) Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 74(5):1094–1102CrossRef Lee CK, Park DI, Lee SH, Hwangbo Y, Eun CS, Han DS et al (2011) Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 74(5):1094–1102CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Deliwala SS, Hamid K, Barbarawi M, Lakshman H, Zayed Y, Kandel P et al (2021) Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis Deliwala SS, Hamid K, Barbarawi M, Lakshman H, Zayed Y, Kandel P et al (2021) Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Leggett B, Whitehall V (2010) Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 138(6):2088–2100CrossRef Leggett B, Whitehall V (2010) Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 138(6):2088–2100CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz M, Fatima R, Dong C, Lee-Smith W, Nawras A (2020) The impact of deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 35(10):1676–1683CrossRef Aziz M, Fatima R, Dong C, Lee-Smith W, Nawras A (2020) The impact of deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 35(10):1676–1683CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, McNeil RB, Cleveland P et al (2011) Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 73(6):1223–1231CrossRef Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, McNeil RB, Cleveland P et al (2011) Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 73(6):1223–1231CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmad OF, Soares AS, Mazomenos E, Brandao P, Vega R, Seward E et al (2019) Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(1):71–80CrossRef Ahmad OF, Soares AS, Mazomenos E, Brandao P, Vega R, Seward E et al (2019) Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(1):71–80CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lui TKL, Guo CG, Leung WK (2020) Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 92(1):11-22.e6CrossRef Lui TKL, Guo CG, Leung WK (2020) Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 92(1):11-22.e6CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Ding W, Wang Y, Tan Y, Xi C, Ye N et al (2021) Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16(2):e0246892 Xu Y, Ding W, Wang Y, Tan Y, Xi C, Ye N et al (2021) Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16(2):e0246892
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Meester RGS, Ladabaum U (2020) Sessile serrated polyps and colorectal cancer mortality. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(6):516–517CrossRef Meester RGS, Ladabaum U (2020) Sessile serrated polyps and colorectal cancer mortality. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(6):516–517CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC (2009) The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69(3 Pt 2):620–625CrossRef Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC (2009) The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 69(3 Pt 2):620–625CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Lu J, Yan J, Tan Y, Liu D (2021) Artificial intelligence can increase the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33(8):1041–1048CrossRef Li J, Lu J, Yan J, Tan Y, Liu D (2021) Artificial intelligence can increase the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33(8):1041–1048CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang X, Zhao L, Zhu Z, Leung F, Wang L, Wang X et al (2018) Same-day single dose of 2 liter polyethylene glycol is not inferior to the standard bowel preparation regimen in low-risk patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 113(4):601–610CrossRef Kang X, Zhao L, Zhu Z, Leung F, Wang L, Wang X et al (2018) Same-day single dose of 2 liter polyethylene glycol is not inferior to the standard bowel preparation regimen in low-risk patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 113(4):601–610CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaukat A, Rector TS, Church TR, Lederle FA, Kim AS, Rank JM et al (2015) Longer withdrawal time is associated with a reduced incidence of interval cancer after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 149(4):952–7 Shaukat A, Rector TS, Church TR, Lederle FA, Kim AS, Rank JM et al (2015) Longer withdrawal time is associated with a reduced incidence of interval cancer after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 149(4):952–7
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Zippelius C, Alqahtani SA, Schedel J, Brookman-Amissah D, Muehlenberg K, Federle C et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence system for adenoma detection in daily practice: a prospective non-randomized comparative study. Endoscopy Zippelius C, Alqahtani SA, Schedel J, Brookman-Amissah D, Muehlenberg K, Federle C et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence system for adenoma detection in daily practice: a prospective non-randomized comparative study. Endoscopy
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu Q, Gu C, Wang Z (2021) Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu Q, Gu C, Wang Z (2021) Artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazarian S, Glover B, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Teare J (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 23(7):e27370 Nazarian S, Glover B, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Teare J (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 23(7):e27370
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
verfasst von
Ding Huang
Jingyi Shen
Jiaze Hong
Yi Zhang
Senjie Dai
Nannan Du
Mengting Zhang
Daxin Guo
Publikationsdatum
11.11.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04062-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.