Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015

01.06.2015

Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study

verfasst von: Yan Xiao, Gang Shi, Jin Zhang, Jian-Guo Cao, Li-Jun Liu, Ting-Hao Chen, Zhi-Zhou Li, Hong Wang, Han Zhang, Zhao-Fen Lin, Jun-Hua Lu, Tian Yang

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been rapidly applied worldwide recently. The issue of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy needs to be re-investigated and analyzed along with this trend. This study aimed to identify risk factors of SSI after appendectomy in recent years.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted among patients with acute appendicitis who underwent either laparoscopic or open appendectomy (OA) at 7 general hospitals in China from 2010 to 2013. The incidence of SSI, classified as incisional SSI and organ/space SSI, was investigated. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors associated with overall, incisional, and organ/space SSI, respectively.

Results

Among 16,263 consecutive patients, 3,422 (21.0 %) and 12,841 (79.0 %) patients underwent LA and OA, respectively. The incidences of overall, incisional, and organ/space SSI were 6.2, 3.7, and 3.0 %, respectively. The proportion of LAs among both procedures increased yearly from 5.3 to 46.5 %, while the incidences of overall and incisional SSI after appendectomy simultaneously decreased yearly from 9.6 to 4.5 % and from 6.7 to 2.2 %, respectively. In comparison with OA, LA was associated with lower incidences of overall and incisional SSI (4.5 vs 6.7 %, P < 0.001; and 1.9 vs 4.2 %, P < 0.001), but a similar incidence of organ/space SSI (3.0 vs 3.0 %, P = 0.995). After multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, LA was found to be independently associated with a decrease in development of overall SSI [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) OR (95 % CI), 1.24 (1.03–1.70); P = 0.04] or incisional SSI [OR (95 % CI), 1.32 (1.10–1.68); P = 0.01].

Conclusion

With the increasing application trends of laparoscopic procedure, the incidence of SSI after appendectomy declined accordingly. Compared with OA, LA was independently associated with a significantly lower incidence of incisional SSI, but a similar incidence of organ/space SSI.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32:470–485CrossRef National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32:470–485CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ (2011) Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 253:1082–1093CrossRefPubMed Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ (2011) Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 253:1082–1093CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KM (2011) Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 254:494–499 discussion 499–501CrossRefPubMed Hawn MT, Vick CC, Richman J, Holman W, Deierhoi RJ, Graham LA, Henderson WG, Itani KM (2011) Surgical site infection prevention: time to move beyond the surgical care improvement program. Ann Surg 254:494–499 discussion 499–501CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson KM, Oldenburg WA, Deschamps C, Rupp WC, Smith CD (2011) Chasing zero: the drive to eliminate surgical site infections. Ann Surg 254(3):430–436CrossRefPubMed Thompson KM, Oldenburg WA, Deschamps C, Rupp WC, Smith CD (2011) Chasing zero: the drive to eliminate surgical site infections. Ann Surg 254(3):430–436CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S (2008) Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 95:363–368CrossRefPubMed Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S (2008) Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 95:363–368CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F (2008) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go. World J Gastroenterol 14:4909–4914CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F (2008) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go. World J Gastroenterol 14:4909–4914CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208CrossRefPubMed Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB (2011) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 25:1199–1208CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1195CrossRefPubMed Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1195CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRefPubMed Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546PubMed Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040CrossRefPubMed Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939CrossRefPubMed Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256CrossRefPubMed Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243:17–27CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243:17–27CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276CrossRefPubMed Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2011) Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 35:1221–1226 discussion 1227–1228CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2011) Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg 35:1221–1226 discussion 1227–1228CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Khiria LS, Ardhnari R, Mohan N, Kumar P, Nambiar R (2011) Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:142–145CrossRefPubMed Khiria LS, Ardhnari R, Mohan N, Kumar P, Nambiar R (2011) Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:142–145CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Messing S, Gunzler D, Salloum R, Monson JR (2010) Balancing the risk of postoperative surgical infections: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with laparoscopic appendectomy from the NSQIP database. Ann Surg 252:895–900CrossRefPubMed Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Messing S, Gunzler D, Salloum R, Monson JR (2010) Balancing the risk of postoperative surgical infections: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with laparoscopic appendectomy from the NSQIP database. Ann Surg 252:895–900CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214CrossRefPubMed Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Complicated appendicitis: is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 73:737–741 discussion 741–742PubMed Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Complicated appendicitis: is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 73:737–741 discussion 741–742PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A, Tkacz N, Curci M (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960) 136:438–441 Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A, Tkacz N, Curci M (2001) Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960) 136:438–441
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson CM, Coopersmith CM (2006) The systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Microbes Infect 8:1382–1389CrossRefPubMed Robertson CM, Coopersmith CM (2006) The systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Microbes Infect 8:1382–1389CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132 quiz 133–134; discussion 96CrossRefPubMed Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132 quiz 133–134; discussion 96CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932CrossRefPubMed Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandona P, Mantoan D, Baldo V (2012) Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database. Surg Endosc 26:2353–2359CrossRefPubMed Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, Callegaro G, Sandona P, Mantoan D, Baldo V (2012) Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database. Surg Endosc 26:2353–2359CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Brill A, Ghosh K, Gunnarsson C, Rizzo J, Fullum T, Maxey C, Brossette S (2008) The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks. Surg Endosc 22:1112–1118CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brill A, Ghosh K, Gunnarsson C, Rizzo J, Fullum T, Maxey C, Brossette S (2008) The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks. Surg Endosc 22:1112–1118CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasatpibal N, Norgaard M, Sorensen HT, Schonheyder HC, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V (2006) Risk of surgical site infection and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis: a cohort study of appendectomy patients in Thailand. BMC Infect Dis 6:111CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kasatpibal N, Norgaard M, Sorensen HT, Schonheyder HC, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V (2006) Risk of surgical site infection and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis: a cohort study of appendectomy patients in Thailand. BMC Infect Dis 6:111CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotermann M (2004) Infection after cholecystectomy, hysterectomy or appendectomy. Health Rep 15:11–23PubMed Rotermann M (2004) Infection after cholecystectomy, hysterectomy or appendectomy. Health Rep 15:11–23PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448 discussion 448–450PubMedCentralPubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448 discussion 448–450PubMedCentralPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N (2013) Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27:1061–1071CrossRefPubMed Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N (2013) Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27:1061–1071CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269CrossRefPubMed Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Marzouk M, Khater M, Elsadek M, Abdelmoghny A (2003) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients. Surg Endosc 17:721–724CrossRefPubMed Marzouk M, Khater M, Elsadek M, Abdelmoghny A (2003) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients. Surg Endosc 17:721–724CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2007) Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery. World J Surg 31:744–749CrossRefPubMed Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2007) Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery. World J Surg 31:744–749CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Tate JJ, Chung SC, Dawson J, Leong HT, Chan A, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 80:761–764CrossRefPubMed Tate JJ, Chung SC, Dawson J, Leong HT, Chan A, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 80:761–764CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodham BL, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:2566–2570CrossRefPubMed Woodham BL, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of laparoscopic over open appendicectomy for obese individuals: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26:2566–2570CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMed Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuggle KR, Ortega G, Bolorunduro OB, Oyetunji TA, Alexander R, Turner PL, Chang DC, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database. J Surg Res 163:225–228CrossRefPubMed Tuggle KR, Ortega G, Bolorunduro OB, Oyetunji TA, Alexander R, Turner PL, Chang DC, Cornwell EE 3rd, Fullum TM (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database. J Surg Res 163:225–228CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148:625–635 discussion 635–637CrossRefPubMed Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148:625–635 discussion 635–637CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–192 discussion 192–193CrossRefPubMed Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1:188–192 discussion 192–193CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang E, Ortega AE, Anthone GJ, Beart RW Jr (1996) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. Surg Endosc 10:327–328CrossRefPubMed Tang E, Ortega AE, Anthone GJ, Beart RW Jr (1996) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. Surg Endosc 10:327–328CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart DC, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 20:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart DC, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 20:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouwenhoven EA, van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19:923–926CrossRefPubMed Kouwenhoven EA, van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19:923–926CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa-Navarro D, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Illan-Riquelme A (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy: quality care and cost-effectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg 8:45CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Costa-Navarro D, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Illan-Riquelme A (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy: quality care and cost-effectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg 8:45CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fullum TM, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL (2010) Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database. Surg Endosc 24:845–853CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Fullum TM, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL (2010) Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database. Surg Endosc 24:845–853CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore DE, Speroff T, Grogan E, Poulose B, Holzman MD (2005) Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 19:374–378CrossRefPubMed Moore DE, Speroff T, Grogan E, Poulose B, Holzman MD (2005) Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 19:374–378CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261 discussion 261–262CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. A prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261 discussion 261–262CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang CC, Tu CC, Wang PC, Lin HC, Wei PL (2013) Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 8:e68662CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wang CC, Tu CC, Wang PC, Lin HC, Wei PL (2013) Outcome comparison between laparoscopic and open appendectomy: evidence from a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 8:e68662CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255CrossRefPubMed Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Chu Z, Qin H (2010) Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:362–370CrossRefPubMed Liu Z, Zhang P, Ma Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Zhang M, Chu Z, Qin H (2010) Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:362–370CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S, Matheson NA (1988) Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review. Br J Surg 75:1023–1033CrossRefPubMed Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S, Matheson NA (1988) Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review. Br J Surg 75:1023–1033CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2005) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001439PubMed Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK (2005) Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001439PubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rossem CC, Schreinemacher MH, Treskes K, van Hogezand RM, van Geloven AA (2014) Duration of antibiotic treatment after appendicectomy for acute complicated appendicitis. Br J Surg 101:715–719CrossRefPubMed van Rossem CC, Schreinemacher MH, Treskes K, van Hogezand RM, van Geloven AA (2014) Duration of antibiotic treatment after appendicectomy for acute complicated appendicitis. Br J Surg 101:715–719CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study
verfasst von
Yan Xiao
Gang Shi
Jin Zhang
Jian-Guo Cao
Li-Jun Liu
Ting-Hao Chen
Zhi-Zhou Li
Hong Wang
Han Zhang
Zhao-Fen Lin
Jun-Hua Lu
Tian Yang
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3809-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.