nach oben

Updates in Surgery

Erschienen in:

18.07.2022 | Review Article

Esophagectomy—prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage

verfasst von: Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Stefano de Pascale, The IEO Group for Upper GI Surgery

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Esophagectomy still remains the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Many progresses have been made in the technique of esophagectomy in the last decades but the overall morbidity for this operation remains formidable. Postoperative complication and mortality rate after esophagectomy are significant; anastomotic leak has an incidence of 11,4%. The occurrence of a complication is a significant negative prognostic factor for long term survival and is also linked to longer postoperative stay, a lower quality of life, increased hospital costs. Preventing the occurrence of postoperative morbidity and reducing associated postoperative mortality rate is a major goal for surgeons experienced in resective esophageal surgery. Many details of pre, intra and postoperative care for patients undergoing esophagectomy need to be shared among the professionals taking care of these patients (oncologists, dieticians, physiotherapists, surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, gastroenterologists) in order to improve the short and long term clinical results.

Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G, Davies A, D’Journo XB, Gisbertz SS, Griffin SM, Hardwick R, Hoelscher A, Hofstetter W, Jobe B, Kitagawa Y, Law S, Mariette C, Maynard N, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Pera M, Pramesh CS, Puig S, Reynolds JV, Schroeder W, Smithers M, Wijnhoven BPL (2019) Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 269:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611CrossRef

Booka E, Takeuchi H, Suda K, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Wada N, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y (2018) Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open 19 2(5):276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.64CrossRef

Fransen LFC, Berkelmans GHK, Asti E, Henegouwen MIVB, Berlth F, Bonavina L, Brown A, Bruns C, Daele E (2021) The effect of postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy on long-term survival: an international multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg 1(274):e1129–e1137. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003772CrossRef

Fumagalli UR, Bersani M, Russo A, Melis A, de Pascale S, Rosati R (2013) Volume and outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery: the experience of the Region of Lombardy-Italy. Updates Surg 65(4):271–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0227-yCrossRef

Mamidanna R, Ni Z, Anderson O, Spiegelhalter D, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB (2016) Surgeon volume and cancer esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreatectomy: a population-based study in England. Ann Surg 263(4):727–732. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001490CrossRef

Hallet J, Jerath A, Turgeon AF, McIsaac DI, Eskander A, Zuckerman J et al (2021) Association between anesthesiologist volume and short-term outcomes in complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 156(5):479–487. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0135CrossRef

Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy EL (2012) Volume outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 16(5):1055–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1731-3CrossRef

Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA (2016) Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery. Ann Surg 263(4):692–697. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001414CrossRef

Abdelsattar ZM, Habermann E, Borah BJ, Moriarty JP, Rojas RL, Blackmon SH (2020) Understanding failure to rescue after esophagectomy in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 109(3):865–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.044CrossRef

10.

Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallböhmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Hölscher AH (2004) High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus 17(4):310–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00431.xCrossRef

11.

Fuchs HF, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, Chang DC, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR (2016) Simple preoperative risk scale accurately predicts perioperative mortality following esophagectomy for malignancy: predicting mortality post-esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 30(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12451CrossRef

12.

D’Journo XB, Berbis J, Jougon J, Brichon P-Y, Mouroux J, Tiffet O (2016) External validation of a risk score in the prediction of the mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: mortality after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 30(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12447CrossRef

13.

Müller PC, Morell B, Vetter D, Raptis DA, Kapp JR, Gubler C, Gutschow CA (2021) Preemptive endoluminal vacuum therapy to reduce morbidity after minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy: including a novel grading system for postoperative endoscopic assessment of GI-anastomoses. Ann Surg 274(5):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005125CrossRef

14.

D’Journo XB, Boulate D, Fourdrain A, Loundou A, Henegouwen MIVB, Gisbertz SS (2021) Risk prediction model of 90-day mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. JAMA Surg 156(9):836–845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2376CrossRef

15.

Scarpa M, Filip B, Cavallin F, Alfieri R, Saadeh L, Cagol M, Castoro C (2016) Esophagectomy in elderly patients: which is the best prognostic score? Dis Esophagus 29:589–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12358CrossRef

16.

Kooten RT, Voeten DM, Steyerberg EW, Hartgrink HH, Henegouwen MIVB, Rv H, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM (2022) Patient-related prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage, major complications, and short-term mortality following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg Oncol 29:1358–1373. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10734-3CrossRef

17.

Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H (2021) Comparing perioperative mortality and morbidity of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide retrospective analysis. Ann Surg 274:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003500CrossRef

18.

Bossi P, Delrio P, Mascheroni A, Zanetti M (2021) The spectrum of malnutrition/cachexia, sarcopenia in oncology according to different cancer types and settings: a narrative review. Nutrients 13(6):1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061980CrossRef

19.

Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, Calder PC, Deutz NEP et al (2017) ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr 36:1187–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017CrossRef

20.

Guinan EM, Doyle SL, Bennett AE, O’Neill L, Gannon J, Elliott JA, O’Sullivan J, Reynolds JV, Hussey J (2018) Sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal cancer: characterising the impact on muscle strength and physical performance. Support Care Cancer 26(5):1569–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3993-0CrossRef

21.

Jin S-b, Tian Z-b, Ding X-l, Guo Y-j, Mao T, Yu Y-n, Wang K-x, Jing X (2021) The impact of preoperative sarcopenia on survival prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 23(11):619592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.619592CrossRef

22.

Porzio G (2017) Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica. Trattamento e Prevenzione Della Cachessia Neoplastica http://media.aiom.it/userfiles/files/doc/LG/2017_LGAIOM_Cachessia.pdf

23.

Ligthart-Melis G-C, Weijs PJM, te Boveldt ND, Buskermolen S, Earthman CP, Verheul HMW, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, van Weyenberg SJB, van der Peet DL (2013) Dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support is associated with a decrease in severe postoperative complications after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 26(6):587–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12008CrossRef

24.

Chao PC, Chuang HJ, Tsao LY, Chen PY, Hsu CF, Lin HC, Chang CY, Lin CF (2015) The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and a nutrition education program for high risk cancer patients: strategies to improve dietary intake in cancer patients. Biomedicine (Taipei) 5(3):17. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40681-015-0017-6CrossRef

25.

Malmstrom TK, Morley JE (2013) SARC-F: a simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14(8):531–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.018CrossRef

26.

Peng J, Cai J, Niu Z-X, Chen L-Q (2016) Early enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition for esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 29(4):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12337CrossRef

27.

Zhong J, Kang K, Shu X (2015) Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcomes in perioperative malnourished patients: a meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 24(3):367–378. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.2015.24.3.20CrossRef

28.

Mingliang W, Zhangyan K, Fangfang F, Huizhen W, Yongxiang L (2020) Perioperative immunonutrition in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: the first meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Dis Esophagus 33(4):doz111. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doz111CrossRef

29.

Zhuo Z-G, Luo J, Deng H-Y, Song T-N, Alai G-H, Shen X, Lin Y-D (2021) Is immunonutrition superior to standard enteral nutrition in reducing postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JBUON 26(1):204–210

30.

Wynter-Blyth V, Moorthy K (2017) Prehabilitation: preparing patients for surgery. BMJ 8(358):j3702. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3702CrossRef

31.

Jurca R, Jackson AS, LaMonte MJ, Morrow JR Jr, Blair SN, Wareham NJ, Haskell WL, van Mechelen W, Church TS, Jakicic JM, Laukkanen R (2005) Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing. Am J Prev Med 29(3):185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.004CrossRef

32.

Yamamoto K, Nagatsuma Y, Fukuda Y, Hirao M, Nishikawa K, Miyamoto A, Ikeda M, Nakamori S, Sekimoto M, Fujitani K, Tsujinaka T (2017) Effectiveness of a preoperative exercise and nutritional support program for elderly sarcopenic patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 20(5):913–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0683-4CrossRef

33.

Bennett AE, O’Neill L, Connolly D, Guinan EM, Boland L, Doyle SL, O’Sullivan J, Reynolds JV, Hussey J (2018) Patient experiences of a physiotherapy-led multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention after successful treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer. Support Care Cancer 26(8):2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4112-6CrossRef

34.

Hijazi Y, Gondal U, Aziz O (2017) A systematic review of prehabilitation programs in abdominal cancer surgery. Int J Surg 39:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.111CrossRef

35.

Assouline B, Cools E, Schorer R, Kayser B, Elia N, Licker M (2021) Preoperative exercise training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing major surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 18(4):678–688. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-183OCCrossRef

36.

Guinan EM, Forde C, O’Neill L, Gannon J, Doyle SL, Valkenet K, Trappenburg JCA, van Hillegersberg R, Ravi N, Hussey JM, Reynolds JV (2019) Effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training on physical functioning following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy091CrossRef

37.

Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Loiselle SE, Agnihotram RV, Ferri LE, Carli F (2018) Effect of exercise and nutrition prehabilitation on functional capacity in esophagogastric cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 153(12):1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1645CrossRef

38.

Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR et al (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486-94-494–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000089858.40725.68CrossRef

39.

Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379(9829):1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9CrossRef

40.

Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 380(2):152–216. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805101CrossRef

41.

Espinoza-Mercado F, Imai TA, Borgella JD et al (2019) (2019) Does the approach matter? Comparing survival in robotic, minimally invasive and open esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 107(2):378e85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.039CrossRef

42.

van Workum F, Stenstra MHBC, Berkelmans GHK, Slaman AE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS (2019) Learning curve and associated morbidity of minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 269(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002469CrossRef

43.

Tapias LF, Morse CR (2014) Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1130–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.014CrossRef

44.

van der Wilk BJ, Hagens ERC, Eyck BM, Gisbertz SS, van Hillegersberg R, Nafteux P et al (2022) Outcomes after totally minimally invasive versus hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: results from the International Esodata Study Group. BJS. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab432CrossRef

45.

Prasad P, Wallace L, Navidi M, Phillips AW (2022) Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and evaluation of benchmarking parameters. Surgery 171(5):1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.050CrossRef

46.

van Workum F, van den Wildenberg FJH, Polat F et al (2021) Learning curves and safe implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Esophagus 4:36. https://doi.org/10.21037/aoe-2020-04CrossRef

47.

Broeders IAMJ, Ruurda JP (2002) Robotics in laparoscopic surgery: current status and future perspectives. Scand J Gastroenterol 236:76–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655202320621508CrossRef

48.

van der Sluis PC, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, Babic B, Uzun E, van Hillegersberg R, Lang H, Grimminger PP (2021) Robot-Assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): promising results in 100 consecutive patients (the European Experience). J Gastrointest Surg 25(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04510-8CrossRef

49.

Brinkmann S, Schroeder W, Junggeburth K, Gutschow CA, Bludau M, Hoelscher AH, Leers JM (2016) Incidence and management of chylothorax after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(5):1398–1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.030CrossRef

50.

Vecchiato M, Martino A, Sponza M, Uzzau A, Ziccarelli A, Marchesi F, Petri R (2020) Thoracic duct identification with indocyanine green fluorescence during minimally invasive esophagectomy with patient in prone position. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa030CrossRef

51.

Shah RD, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, Christie NA, Pennathur A, Landreneau RJ, Nason KS (2012) Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 93(3):897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.060CrossRef

52.

Reisenauer JS, Puig CA, Reisenauer CJ, Allen MS, Bendel E, Cassivi SD, Nichols FC, Shen RK, Wigle DA, Blackmon SH (2017) Treatment of postsurgical chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 105(1):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.07.021CrossRef

53.

Lei Y, Feng Y, Zeng B, Zhang X, Chen J, Zou J, Su C, Liu Z, Luo H, Zhang S (2017) Effect of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation in reducing the incidence of postoperative chylothorax during esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 66(5):370–375. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602259CrossRef

54.

Turner SR, Molena DR (2018) The role of intraoperative fluorescence imaging during esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 28(4):567–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2018.07.009CrossRef

55.

Jardinet T, Niekel MC, Ruppert M, Hubens G, Valk JW, van Schil PE, de Maat MF (2021) Fluorescence guided thoracic duct dissection in robotic en-bloc esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg S0003–4975(21):01594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.08.034CrossRef

56.

Slooter MD, de Bruin DM, Eshuis WJ, Veelo DP, van Dieren S, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2021) Quantitative fluorescence-guided perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit to predict anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 34(5):doaa100. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa100CrossRef

57.

Athanasiou A, Hennessy M, Spartalis E, Tan BHL, Griffiths EA (2019) Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: an up-to-date literature review. World J Gastrointest Surg 11(3):155–168. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i3.155CrossRef

58.

Talavera-Urquijo E, Parise P, Palucci M, Olivari G, Turi S, Cossu A, Barbieri L, Elmore U, Rosati R (2020) Perfusion speed of indocyanine green in the stomach before tubulization is an objective and useful parameter to evaluate gastric microcirculation during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 34(12):5649–5659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07924-7CrossRef

59.

De Nardi P, Elmore U, Maggi G, Maggiore R, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Fumagalli U, Gardani M, De Pascale S, Parise P, Vignali A, Rosati R (2020) Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 34(1):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06730-0CrossRef

60.

Slooter MD, Eshuis WJ, Cuesta MA, Gisbertz SS, Van Berge Henegouwen MI (2019) Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green during esophagectomy to prevent surgical morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 11(5):S755–S765. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.01.30CrossRef

61.

Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N, Mocanu V, Tian C, Birch D, Turner SR, Karmali S (2019) Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 33(2):384–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6503-7CrossRef

62.

Kumagai Y, Hatano S, Sobajima J, Ishiguro T, Fukuchi M, Ishibashi KI, Mochiki E, Nakajima Y, Ishida H (2018) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: efficacy of the 90-second rule. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy052CrossRef

63.

Yamaguchi K, Kumagai Y, Saito K, Hoshino A, Tokairin Y, Kawada K, Nakajima Y, Yamazaki S, Ishida H, Kinugasa Y (2021) The evaluation of the gastric tube blood flow by indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during esophagectomy: a multicenter prospective study. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 69(7):1118–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01640-2CrossRef

64.

Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Oguma J, Kazuno A, Yamazaki Y, Ninomiya Y, Ochiai H, Tachimori Y (2016) Blood flow speed of the gastric conduit assessed by indocyanine green fluorescence: new predictive evaluation of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(30):e4386. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004386CrossRef

65.

Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2013) Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(13):4274–4281. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3189-xCrossRef

66.

Bonavina L (2021) Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Transl Med 9(10):907. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.03.66CrossRef

67.

Fabbi M, De Pascale S, Ascari F, Petz WL, FumagalliRomario U (2021) Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes. Updates Surg 73(5):1837–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01054-yCrossRef

68.

Irino T, Tsai JA, Ericson J, Nilsson M, Lundell L, Rouvelas I (2016) Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(3):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1396-1CrossRef

69.

Lin H, Liang G, Chai H, Liao Y, Zhang C, Cheng Y (2021) Comparison of two circular-stapled techniques for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Front Oncol 11:759599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759599CrossRef

70.

Schröder W, Raptis DA, Schmidt HM, Gisbertz SS, Moons J, Asti E, Luyer MDP, Hölscher AH, Schneider PM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Räsanen J, Palazzo F, Mercer S, Bonavina L, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Wijjnhoven BPL, Pattyn P, Grimminger PP, Bruns CJ, Gutschow CA (2019) Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the esobenchmark database. Ann Surg 270(5):820–826. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003538CrossRef

71.

Platell C, Cooper D, Papadimitriou JM, Hall JC (2000) The omentum. World J Gastroenterol 6(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v6.i2.169CrossRef

72.

Coffey JC, O’leary DP (2017) Defining the mesentery as an organ and what this means for understanding its roles in digestive disorders. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(8):703–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2017.1329010CrossRef

73.

Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M (1992) Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 35(8):731–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050320CrossRef

74.

Tuo G, Jin G, Pang Y, Wang W, Zhu X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Wu P, Zhu Z (2020) Omentoplasty decreases leak rate after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 24(6):1237–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04284-zCrossRef

75.

Wei S, Tian J, Song X, Chen Y (2008) Association of perioperative fluid balance and adverse surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 86(1):266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.017CrossRef

76.

Glatz T, Kulemann B, Marjanovic G, Bregenzer S, Makowiec F, Hoeppner J (2017) Postoperative fluid overload is a risk factor for adverse surgical outcome in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective study in 335 patients. BMC Surg 17(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0203-9CrossRef

77.

Van Dessel E, Moons J, Nafteux P, Van Veer H, Depypere L, Coosemans W, Lerut T, Coppens S, Neyrinck A (2021) Perioperative fluid management in esophagectomy for cancer and its relation to postoperative respiratory complications. Dis Esophagus 34(7):doaa111. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa111CrossRef

78.

Taniguchi H, Sasaki T, Fujita H, Kobayashi H, Kawasaki R, Ogata T, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Ushigome K, Tanaka A, Takano O (2018) Effects of goal-directed fluid therapy on enhanced postoperative recovery: an interventional comparative observational study with a historical control group on oesophagectomy combined with ERAS program. Clin Nutr ESPEN 23:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.10.002CrossRef

79.

Raphael J, Regali LA, Thiele RH (2017) Hemodynamic monitoring in thoracic surgical patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30(1):7–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000408CrossRef

80.

Jeong DM, Ahn HJ, Park HW, Yang M, Kim JA, Park J (2017) Stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation are not useful for predicting fluid responsiveness in thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 125(4):1158–1165. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002056CrossRef

81.

Carney A, Dickinson M (2015) Anesthesia for esophagectomy. Anesthesiol Clin 33(1):143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2014.11.009CrossRef

82.

Durkin C, Schisler T, Lohser J (2017) Current trends in anesthesia for esophagectomy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000409CrossRef

83.

Yamasaki H, Tanaka K, Funai Y, Suehiro K, Ikenaga K, Mori T, Osugi H, Nishikawa K (2014) The impact of intraoperative hypothermia on early postoperative adverse events after radical esophagectomy for cancer: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 28(4):943–947. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2014.02.013CrossRef

84.

Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Canet J, Spieth PM, Rocco PR, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M (2015) Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology 123(3):692–713. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000754CrossRef

85.

Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, Ferri L, Immanuel A, Kuppusamy M, Law S, Lindblad M, Maynard N, Neal J, Pramesh CS, Scott M, Mark Smithers B, Addor V, Ljungqvist O (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg 43(2):299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4CrossRef

86.

Michelet P, D’Journo XB, Roch A, Doddoli C, Marin V, Papazian L, Decamps I, Bregeon F, Thomas P, Auffray JP (2006) Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 105(5):911–919. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200611000-00011CrossRef

87.

Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A et al (2014) 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur J Anaesthesiol 31(10):517–573. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000150CrossRef

88.

Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, Kurz A (2017) Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology 126(1):47–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432CrossRef

89.

Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 112(6):1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181eeaae5CrossRef

90.

Fumagalli U, Melis A, Balazova J, Lascari V, Morenghi E, Rosati R (2016) Intra-operative hypotensive episodes may be associated with post-operative esophageal anastomotic leak. Updates Surg 68(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0369-9CrossRef

91.

Klevebro F, Boshier PR, Low DE (2019) Application of standardized hemodynamic protocols within enhanced recovery after surgery programs to improve outcomes associated with anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 11(Suppl 5):S692–S701. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.11.141CrossRef

92.

Kobayashi M, Koh M, Irinoda T, Meguro E, Hayakawa Y, Takagane A (2009) Stroke volume variation as a predictor of intravascular volume depression and possible hypotension during the early postoperative period after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1371–1377. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0139-0CrossRef

93.

Theodorou D, Drimousis PG, Larentzakis A, Papalois A, Toutouzas KG, Katsaragakis S (2008) The effects of vasopressors on perfusion of gastric graft after esophagectomy. An experimental study. J Gastrointest Surg 12(9):1497–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0575-yCrossRef

94.

Al-Rawi OY, Pennefather SH, Page RD, Dave I, Russell GN (2008) The effect of thoracic epidural bupivacaine and an intravenous adrenaline infusion on gastric tube blood flow during esophagectomy. Anesth Analg 106(3):884–7, table of contents. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318164f153

95.

Pathak D, Pennefather SH, Russell GN, Al Rawi O, Dave IC, Gilby S, Page RD (2013) Phenylephrine infusion improves blood flow to the stomach during oesophagectomy in the presence of a thoracic epidural analgesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44(1):130–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs644CrossRef

96.

Downey CL, Chapman S, Randell R, Brown JM, Jayne DG (2018) The impact of continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in hospitals: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 84:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.013CrossRef

97.

Breteler MJM, KleinJan E, Numan L, Ruurda JP, Van Hillegersberg R, Leenen LPH, Hermans M, Kalkman CJ, Blokhuis TJ (2020) Are current wireless monitoring systems capable of detecting adverse events in high-risk surgical patients? A descriptive study. Injury 51(Suppl 2):S97–S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.018CrossRef

98.

Sessler DI, Saugel B (2019) Beyond “failure to rescue”: the time has come for continuous ward monitoring. Br J Anaesth 122(3):304–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.003CrossRef

99.

Kaaki S, Grigor EJM, Maziak DE, Seely AJE (2022) Early oral intake and early removal of nasogastric tube post-esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 5(5):e1538. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1538CrossRef

100.

Mei LX, Liang GB, Dai L, Wang YY, Chen MW, Mo JX (2022) Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 30(4):3473–3483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06813-0CrossRef

101.

Deana C, Vetrugno L, Bignami E, Bassi F (2021) Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint. J Thorac Dis 13(10):6037–6051. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-940CrossRef

102.

Wang Q, Zhang G, Wei S, He Z, Sun L, Zheng H (2019) Comparison of the effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and wound infiltration on perioperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain in thoracotomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 29(12):1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.12.1138CrossRef

103.

Helms O, Mariano J, Hentz JG, Santelmo N, Falcoz PE, Massard G, Steib A (2011) Intra-operative paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(4):902–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.067CrossRef

104.

Bull A, Pucher PH, Lagergren J, Gossage JA (2021) Chest drainage after oesophageal resection: a systematic review. Dis Esophagus. 35(7) https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doab069CrossRef

Titel: Esophagectomy—prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage
verfasst von: Uberto Fumagalli Romario
Stefano de Pascale
The IEO Group for Upper GI Surgery
Publikationsdatum: 18.07.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01332-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Esophagectomy—prevention of complications-tips and tricks for the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative stage

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience

Post-esophagectomy tracheobronchoesophageal fistula: management and results of a tertiary referral center

Does radiomics play a role in the diagnosis, staging and re-staging of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma?

Relaparoscopy in the management of post-operative complications after minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Application of ERAS protocols in esophagogastric emergency surgery: is it feasible and does it make sense?

Application of indocyanine green (ICG)-guided surgery in clinical practice: lesson to learn from other organs—an overview on clinical applications and future perspectives

Update Chirurgie