Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2023

17.04.2023

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections for hepatolithiasis: an international multicenter propensity score matched analysis

verfasst von: Bong Jun Kwak, Jae Hoon Lee, Ken Min Chin, Nicholas L. Syn, Sung Hoon Choi, Tan To Cheung, Adrian K. H. Chiow, Iswanto Sucandy, Marco V. Marino, Mikel Prieto, Charing C. Chong, Gi Hong Choi, Mikhail Efanov, T. Peter Kingham, Robert P. Sutcliffe, Roberto I. Troisi, Johann Pratschke, Xiaoying Wang, Mathieu D’Hondt, Chung Ngai Tang, Kohei Mishima, Go Wakabayashi, Daniel Cherqui, Davit L. Aghayan, Bjorn Edwin, Olivier Scatton, Atsushi Sugioka, Tran Cong Duy Long, Constantino Fondevila, Mohammad Alzoubi, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Andrea Ruzzenente, Alessandro Ferrero, Paulo Herman, Boram Lee, David Fuks, Federica Cipriani, Qu Liu, Luca Aldrighetti, Rong Liu, Ho-Seong Han, Brian K. P. Goh, International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is widely recognized as a safe and beneficial procedure in the treatment of both malignant and benign liver diseases. Hepatolithiasis has traditionally been reported to be endemic only in East Asia, but has seen a worldwide uptrend in recent decades with increasingly frequent and invasive endoscopic instrumentation of the biliary tract for a myriad of conditions. To date, there has been a woeful lack of high-quality evidence comparing the laparoscopic (LLR) and robotic (RLR) approaches to treatment hepatolithiasis.

Methods

This is an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 273 patients who underwent RLR or LRR for hepatolithiasis at 33 centers in 2003–2020. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were assessed. To minimize selection bias, 1:1 (48 and 48 cases of RLR and LLR, respectively) and 1:2 (37 and 74 cases of RLR and LLR, respectively) propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

Results

In the unmatched cohort, 63 (23.1%) patients underwent RLR, and 210 (76.9%) patients underwent LLR. Patient clinicopathological characteristics were comparable between the groups after PSM. After 1:1 and 1:2 PSM, RLR was associated with less blood loss (p = 0.003 in 1:2 PSM; p = 0.005 in 1:1 PSM), less patients with blood loss greater than 300 ml (p = 0.024 in 1:2 PSM; p = 0.027 in 1:1 PSM), and lower conversion rate to open surgery (p = 0.003 in 1:2 PSM; p < 0.001 in 1:1 PSM). There was no significant difference between RLR and LLR in use of the Pringle maneuver, median Pringle maneuver duration, 30-day readmission rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, reoperation, and mortality.

Conclusion

Both RLR and LLR were safe and feasible for hepatolithiasis. RLR was associated with significantly less blood loss and lower open conversion rate.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorio E et al (2020) Management of Hepatolithiasis: Review of the Literature. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22(6):30PubMedCrossRef Lorio E et al (2020) Management of Hepatolithiasis: Review of the Literature. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22(6):30PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SE et al (2008) Selection of appropriate liver resection in left hepatolithiasis based on anatomic and clinical study. World J Surg 32(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef Lee SE et al (2008) Selection of appropriate liver resection in left hepatolithiasis based on anatomic and clinical study. World J Surg 32(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakayama F et al (1991) Hepatolithiasis in East Asia: comparison between Japan and China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(2):155–158PubMedCrossRef Nakayama F et al (1991) Hepatolithiasis in East Asia: comparison between Japan and China. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(2):155–158PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindström CG (1977) Frequency of gallstone disease in a well-defined Swedish population. A prospective necropsy study in Malmö. Scand J Gastroenterol 12(3):341–346PubMedCrossRef Lindström CG (1977) Frequency of gallstone disease in a well-defined Swedish population. A prospective necropsy study in Malmö. Scand J Gastroenterol 12(3):341–346PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt SC et al (2002) Right hepatic lobectomy for recurrent cholangitis after combined bile duct and right hepatic artery injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of two cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):183–187PubMedCrossRef Schmidt SC et al (2002) Right hepatic lobectomy for recurrent cholangitis after combined bile duct and right hepatic artery injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of two cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387(3–4):183–187PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H et al (2017) Laparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 23(43):7791–7806PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li H et al (2017) Laparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 23(43):7791–7806PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich H et al (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78(5 Pt 2):956–958PubMed Reich H et al (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78(5 Pt 2):956–958PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X et al (2018) Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 51:151–163PubMedCrossRef Liu X et al (2018) Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 51:151–163PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomulescu V et al (2009) First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 104(2):141–150PubMed Tomulescu V et al (2009) First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 104(2):141–150PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms–a meta-analysis. Surgery 141(2):203–211PubMedCrossRef Simillis C et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms–a meta-analysis. Surgery 141(2):203–211PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Morel P et al (2017) Robotic versus open liver resections: a case-matched comparison. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1800CrossRef Morel P et al (2017) Robotic versus open liver resections: a case-matched comparison. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1800CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Troisi RI et al (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166PubMedCrossRef Troisi RI et al (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Med Robot 9(2):160–166PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shu J et al (2019) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 33(8):2539–2547PubMedCrossRef Shu J et al (2019) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 33(8):2539–2547PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KF et al (2016) Robotic liver resection for primary hepatolithiasis: is it beneficial? World J Surg 40(10):2490–2496PubMedCrossRef Lee KF et al (2016) Robotic liver resection for primary hepatolithiasis: is it beneficial? World J Surg 40(10):2490–2496PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev TB et al (2000) Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000(2):333–339 Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev TB et al (2000) Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000(2):333–339
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149(5):713–724PubMedCrossRef Rahbari NN et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149(5):713–724PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen PD et al (2017) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 24(4):1021–1028PubMedCrossRef Chen PD et al (2017) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 24(4):1021–1028PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S et al (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165(4):731–740PubMedCrossRef Tanaka S et al (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165(4):731–740PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BKP et al (2021) Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 23(5):770–776PubMedCrossRef Goh BKP et al (2021) Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies. HPB (Oxford) 23(5):770–776PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? HBSN 5:281–2819PubMedPubMedCentral Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? HBSN 5:281–2819PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555PubMedCrossRef Tsung A et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Croner RS et al (2016) Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(5):707–714PubMedCrossRef Croner RS et al (2016) Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(5):707–714PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamarajah SK et al (2021) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 110(3):290–300PubMedCrossRef Kamarajah SK et al (2021) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Surg 110(3):290–300PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BKP et al (2019) Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 89(3):201–205PubMedCrossRef Goh BKP et al (2019) Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 89(3):201–205PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sucandy I et al (2020) Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. J Robot Surg 14(1):75–80PubMedCrossRef Sucandy I et al (2020) Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. J Robot Surg 14(1):75–80PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Beard RE et al (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44(3):887–895PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Beard RE et al (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44(3):887–895PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang ZZ et al (2019) Robotic vs laparoscopic hemihepatectomy: a comparative study from a single center. J Surg Oncol 120(4):646–653PubMed Wang ZZ et al (2019) Robotic vs laparoscopic hemihepatectomy: a comparative study from a single center. J Surg Oncol 120(4):646–653PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagenson AM et al (2021) Minimally invasive hepatectomy in North America: laparoscopic versus robotic. J Gastrointest Surg 25(1):85–93PubMedCrossRef Fagenson AM et al (2021) Minimally invasive hepatectomy in North America: laparoscopic versus robotic. J Gastrointest Surg 25(1):85–93PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BKP et al (2018) Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc 32(11):4658–4665PubMedCrossRef Goh BKP et al (2018) Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc 32(11):4658–4665PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung TT et al (2018) The Asia Pacific Consensus Statement on laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report from the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting Held in Hong Kong. Liver Cancer 7(1):28–39PubMedCrossRef Cheung TT et al (2018) The Asia Pacific Consensus Statement on laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a report from the 7th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting Held in Hong Kong. Liver Cancer 7(1):28–39PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo LX, Yu ZY, Bai YN (2014) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(4):213–222PubMedCrossRef Luo LX, Yu ZY, Bai YN (2014) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(4):213–222PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Ma S (2018) Laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of the long-term survival outcomes. Int J Surg 50:35–42PubMedCrossRef Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Ma S (2018) Laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of the long-term survival outcomes. Int J Surg 50:35–42PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang HY et al (2021) Robotic major liver resections: surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 25(1):8–17PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yang HY et al (2021) Robotic major liver resections: surgical outcomes compared with open major liver resections. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 25(1):8–17PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KF et al (2021) Robotic versus open hemihepatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 35(5):2316–2323PubMedCrossRef Lee KF et al (2021) Robotic versus open hemihepatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 35(5):2316–2323PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan R et al (2019) Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis. Asian J Surg 42(1):19–31PubMedCrossRef Guan R et al (2019) Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic liver resection: a meta analysis. Asian J Surg 42(1):19–31PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu L et al (2018) Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Surg 41(5):401–416PubMedCrossRef Hu L et al (2018) Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Surg 41(5):401–416PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y et al (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 44(4):615–628PubMedCrossRef Hu Y et al (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 44(4):615–628PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CC, Fuks D, Lee KF et al (2022) Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 157:e220161 Chong CC, Fuks D, Lee KF et al (2022) Propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy. JAMA Surg 157:e220161
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang HY, Choi GH, Chin KM et al (2022) Robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy: multicentre propensity score-matched analysis. Br J Surg 109:311–314PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yang HY, Choi GH, Chin KM et al (2022) Robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy: multicentre propensity score-matched analysis. Br J Surg 109:311–314PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiow AK, Fuks D, Choi GH et al (2021) International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg 108:1513–1520PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chiow AK, Fuks D, Choi GH et al (2021) International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg 108:1513–1520PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY et al (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 34:2000–2006PubMedCrossRef Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY et al (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 34:2000–2006PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB (Oxford) 21:906–911PubMedCrossRef Fruscione M, Pickens R, Baker EH et al (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center. HPB (Oxford) 21:906–911PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F et al (2020) The impact of robotics in liver surgery: a worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:181–197PubMedCrossRef Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F et al (2020) The impact of robotics in liver surgery: a worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:181–197PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Glazer ES et al (2017) Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. HPB (Oxford) 19:957–965PubMedCrossRef Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Glazer ES et al (2017) Predictors and implications of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive hepatectomy: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. HPB (Oxford) 19:957–965PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin RA et al (2016) Total laparoscopic left hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: eight-year experience in a single center. Surgery 159(3):834–841PubMedCrossRef Jin RA et al (2016) Total laparoscopic left hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: eight-year experience in a single center. Surgery 159(3):834–841PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Aziz H et al (2021) Hospitalization costs and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resections. Am Surg 88:31348211011063 Aziz H et al (2021) Hospitalization costs and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resections. Am Surg 88:31348211011063
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Daskalaki D et al (2017) Financial impact of the robotic approach in liver surgery: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs between the robotic and open technique in a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(4):375–382PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Daskalaki D et al (2017) Financial impact of the robotic approach in liver surgery: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs between the robotic and open technique in a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(4):375–382PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections for hepatolithiasis: an international multicenter propensity score matched analysis
verfasst von
Bong Jun Kwak
Jae Hoon Lee
Ken Min Chin
Nicholas L. Syn
Sung Hoon Choi
Tan To Cheung
Adrian K. H. Chiow
Iswanto Sucandy
Marco V. Marino
Mikel Prieto
Charing C. Chong
Gi Hong Choi
Mikhail Efanov
T. Peter Kingham
Robert P. Sutcliffe
Roberto I. Troisi
Johann Pratschke
Xiaoying Wang
Mathieu D’Hondt
Chung Ngai Tang
Kohei Mishima
Go Wakabayashi
Daniel Cherqui
Davit L. Aghayan
Bjorn Edwin
Olivier Scatton
Atsushi Sugioka
Tran Cong Duy Long
Constantino Fondevila
Mohammad Alzoubi
Mohammad Abu Hilal
Andrea Ruzzenente
Alessandro Ferrero
Paulo Herman
Boram Lee
David Fuks
Federica Cipriani
Qu Liu
Luca Aldrighetti
Rong Liu
Ho-Seong Han
Brian K. P. Goh
International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators
Publikationsdatum
17.04.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10051-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

TAVI versus Klappenchirurgie: Neue Vergleichsstudie sorgt für Erstaunen

21.05.2024 TAVI Nachrichten

Bei schwerer Aortenstenose und obstruktiver KHK empfehlen die Leitlinien derzeit eine chirurgische Kombi-Behandlung aus Klappenersatz plus Bypass-OP. Diese Empfehlung wird allerdings jetzt durch eine aktuelle Studie infrage gestellt – mit überraschender Deutlichkeit.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.